And what are you planning about the franks? What do you have in mind to make them more appealing to players?
Just asking about your personnal opinion on the subject.
One way possibly to get Franks better in imperial age without making them dominant in knight wars is to move bearded axe to the castle age and give them an imperial tech boosting the HP of the knight line. With cheap castles, they can almost certainly afford that whenever they can afford the paladin upgrade, and they will be able to use paladins to a slightly more dominating effect than current models show.
I personally think that Frank's 192 HP paladins are fine the way they are. Halbs require one more strike to kill them, as are for other melee units except for camels. I fear that if you give them more HP or more armour they will be broken.
We are just as entitled to post here as you are.Ugh, Cowboy and Hunab, and other cronies out there - if you don't like this expansion, please STFU and GTFO of this thread.
Fallacy. Whether he does something for free or not adds zero meaning to the argument on whether it's good or bad.Please stop cheaply bashing Cysion, considering how much time and effort he's spending making this for you guys to play FOR FREE.
Hello. I'm glad to see I'm not the only person who grasps how hokey this whole situation is.No I don't agree. I completely DISagree. I believe the whole great thing about AoC, the whole reason why we all still play it 15 years later and every game is still fresh and exciting, is that different units are all useful in different scenarios. You really need to think of real time strategy in this game, unlike a lot of other so called RTS. Not all units are equal... GOOD THING. Not all civs are equal... GOOD THING. Team bonuses, random civs, random maps... GOOD THINGS.Don't you agree mongol mangudai are OP, huns drush+CA is OP? Don't you agree all the bugs that are being fixed in 1.1 need to be fixed?
If not well, why?
up 2 u, I think we won't miss u.
If you don't like huns drush+CA then THE ANSWER FOR YOU is VERY SIMPLE...:
1. Don't play arabia
2. Don't play huns
OMG WAS THAT HARD? LOL..... Wow!
Mangudai is overpowered? What are you playing MICHI WITHOUT SEIGE ONAGERS OR SOMETHING???? LOL.... Mangudai army is very slow and expensive to produce! Mongols is also quite weak in other aspects! I don't think mangudai is overpowered AT ALL. Civs like koreans, goths, saracean, etc completely GG them.
The whole point of the game is to pick what strategy is best for your civs vs the other civs, given the randomness of the maps, team bonuses, etc. I think it's balanced very well considering. There is no strategy that is guaranteed to win, ever, unless you're playing 1v1 huns war maybe. Just because the amount of variation in 1v1 civ war is small, does not mean that the game needs to be changed. It simply means you need to hone your skills more or play different maps/games rather than blame the game for your sucking.
Maybe 1.0c was useful, I can't comment because I didn't play before 1.0c. It's been like 10 years since then and I doubt that everyone wants to relearn all the units/strategies/new civs, etc just because someone with too much time on their hands decided to make an unnecessary patch. Maybe it's a good learning for Cysion, but beyond a small "coolness" factor, I will be sticking with the real game, not someone's fake interpretation of it. This patch will only fragment the small community more and cause negative things.
IF IT AINT BROKE, DONT FIX IT. AoC is going strong for 15 years with no need for a fake "expansion".
P.S. About BUGS... I know there are some and you know what? They never really affected the game enough to be a real problem! So who cares? Fixing rare bugs that don't harm anyone for the last 15 years is NOT IMPORTANT... it's totally TRIVIAL.
Hear hear!
+1
When I took my time to reflect about this "expansion" I came to the same conclusions. Well said good sir.
AoC is very very balanced right now, we don't need a change. Mark my words that this little egoistical (considering people have to ask for Cysion's permission like lapdogs what they are allowed to stream) project will only make the game imbalanced.
HunabKu said:What makes me most sad about this thread however is the hoard of idiots who are riding Cysion's little **** so hard. Do these people think he is a god or something? Lol. Do they not realize that many people could have done this project, just that Cysion is the first one who lacked the decency, common sense, and respect for the game not to bastardize it?
I don't believe in political correctness. Get over it....Honnestly man, this is offensive.
Not only do you bash, but you also insult people now?
The game is called none of your business and I spent 1-2 months waking up, working on it, eating, working on it some more, and sleeping.I'm also curious to know which game you modded, seeing how you react to this project, I doubt you know anything about the work and dedication needed to mod.
The game is called none of your business and I spent 1-2 months waking up, working on it, eating, working on it some more, and sleeping.I'm also curious to know which game you modded, seeing how you react to this project, I doubt you know anything about the work and dedication needed to mod.
I feel sorry for you if this is such a common occurrence for you that you have to immediately accuse others of lying about their accomplishments.Yeah right, .... :roll: My ass. You did'nt mod anything, you're a liar. You are just saying that to have more credits.
If you want us to believe this, show us your so epic mod.
EDIT : I forgot to say BULL SHIIIIIIIIIIIIIT
you must show more respect to people that are doing some great work for AoC
What happened to forum moderators being impartial (rational, wise, etc)? Lmao....
you must show more respect to people that are doing some great work for AoC
My opinion is obviously that his work is not great, it's misguided and stupid.
Now I don't know what your forum rules are, but I follow my own rules:
1. Respect is earned.
etc.
Go ahead and ban me, it won't be the first time power-hungry moderators with little man's syndrome ban superior members of the human race from their shitty forums and then feel smug about themselves thinking they've finally done something meaningful in their lives.
What happened to forum moderators being impartial (rational, wise, etc)? Lmao....
you must show more respect to people that are doing some great work for AoC
My opinion is obviously that his work is not great, it's misguided and stupid.
Now I don't know what your forum rules are, but I follow my own rules:
1. Respect is earned.
etc.
Go ahead and ban me, it won't be the first time power-hungry moderators with little man's syndrome ban superior members of the human race from their shitty forums and then feel smug about themselves thinking they've finally done something meaningful in their lives.
I understand it and I will be kind enough to translate this for you.
What the gentleman said is...
'My skills suck ass, I always get beaten by huns and koreans because I never progress in this game. I am also not smart enough to agree with my opponent to not use huns or koreans before the game starts.'
That's pretty much it.
You're welcome.
11 why always 15xx need to tell that the game is perfectly balanced :lol:
if hun isn't op tell me why the team of beta-testers (nearly all xperts of AoC) made so many changes on them?
just go in your rook games and make some "funny" hunwars without houses, stonewalls and op ca, gl hf