i dont need noone on my side its just enough for me when i am argueing with 1 person not 100 at the same time. and i have some accounts where i defeated 1850+ nicks. i dont care. i am 2k and you are a loser who have no success in age so you search for trouble on this board and need 10 people on your side to feel you strong.
It's fun how you talked about yourself in 3rd person then suddenly changed it to I.
Btw seggen, those 165+ smurfs you talk about. Their profiles indicate nothing of being smurfs.. They've played plenty of games and still they stay around their rate, so I'd like to know how you know that they are smurfs :?:
i dont need noone on my side its just enough for me when i am argueing with 1 person not 100 at the same time. and i have some accounts where i defeated 1850+ nicks. i dont care. i am 2k and you are a loser who have no success in age so you search for trouble on this board and need 10 people on your side to feel you strong.
if u are 2k why dont u play vs some 17xx atleast ?
:lol:
i dont need noone on my side its just enough for me when i am argueing with 1 person not 100 at the same time. and i have some accounts where i defeated 1850+ nicks. i dont care. i am 2k and you are a loser who have no success in age so you search for trouble on this board and need 10 people on your side to feel you strong.
i was thinking about u ops:
Gosh, i could defeat 2k+ certain times and that doesnt make me even 19+.
Having beaten 17++ a few times in your life? Is that what it means to be a 2k?
Gosh, i could defeat 2k+ certain times and that doesnt make me even 19+.
Having beaten 17++ a few times in your life? Is that what it means to be a 2k?
no, to be 2k means to see the number 2000 or higher besides your nick without to have cheated and you should have played all games yourself with your 2k nick.
Gosh, i could defeat 2k+ certain times and that doesnt make me even 19+.
Having beaten 17++ a few times in your life? Is that what it means to be a 2k?
no, to be 2k means to see the number 2000 or higher besides your nick without to have cheated and you should have played all games yourself with your 2k nick.
Thats where most people disagree, because rate should indicate skill. If I say that 99% of the oter 2000 rated players in voobly would beat you 100/100 games, would you agree?
i dont need noone on my side its just enough for me when i am argueing with 1 person not 100 at the same time. and i have some accounts where i defeated 1850+ nicks. i dont care. i am 2k and you are a loser who have no success in age so you search for trouble on this board and need 10 people on your side to feel you strong.
7, your secret accounts where you beat 185+, but of course you wont show us those cause you dont really care about rate etc, right?
Keep on digging, the hole is to deep to get out by now anyways.
the most people dont let seggencool__ play in teamgames because they are scared of him and envy. anyway i can show this qui a teamgame vs 1850+ where he won: http://www.voobly.com/match/view/4746472
I can also show him about 100 games against 165+ on his profile where seggencool__ wins. if qui would read the profile of seggencool__ he would know that he won about 100 games against 1650+ nicks. when seggencool__ beats 1850 it means he is better than that, not as good. it was also said that a lot 1650 are better than 2ks. many players have 1650+ nicks and 2k nicks. about 100 games of seggencooL__ are vs smurfs.
Carlos Ferdinand said:Man im struggling to find logical sentences in any of your last posts seggen.