I don't quite understand this.
Both stratgies attempt roughly the same: disrupt the opponents economy at a very early stage. If successful, you can argue that in both cases one player is put far behind.
Still, almost everyone seems to be fine with the existance of the drush, but lamin is a controversal topic, to put it carefully.
So, what makes the difference here?
Both stratgies attempt roughly the same: disrupt the opponents economy at a very early stage. If successful, you can argue that in both cases one player is put far behind.
Still, almost everyone seems to be fine with the existance of the drush, but lamin is a controversal topic, to put it carefully.
So, what makes the difference here?