As far as I know he is "CancerBoyMarco" and "Manu_Le_Grand" too.does peter have any other acc besides the main one?
Sorck is back? That's great news!There are very few solid BF players. Most of them have 3k ego but very little skill and are just one-trick ponies a lot like some arena clowns. Another thing is that many BF players keep abusing inbalances in aoc and are not willing to switch and learn WK mainly because they have no idea how to play it. From those who are actually good BF players you could name few like TheMax, geen, sorck (who is back recently), slam or rubenstock.
He is using _Tal nick, but he is playing only BFs.Sorck is back? That's great news!
What's his current nickname?
One of the best boomers in the old school, along with Abe. It was a pleasure to watch him playing. I’’m glad to know he is still aroundHe is using _Tal nick, but he is playing only BFs.
Another thing is that many BF players keep abusing imbalances in aoc and are not willing to switch and learn WK mainly because they have no idea how to play it.
He plays so chill, with the occasional 2-steps-ahead counter in imp 11Yeah I like his playstyle and his boom, thats really awesome, only Fer (Schwartz, Sigfried zZ) and Juan had boom like him.
It does but the difference between the best civs and the worst civs is much smaller than in aoc. Also the most OP units/techs from aoc were balanced pretty well. Half of BF tgs in aoc are decided solely by spanish trade, mangudais or SO vs non SO civs. In wk onagers can cut which nullifies half of the problems which aoc BF has. The other is solved by new units like battle ele etc which can compete with imp powerhouses like celt or mongol. Also the weaker civs have more options to rush since walls are weaker in WK, take more res and time to build and maa do better vs walls/buildings. Plus every civ has now something decent for post imp which you cannot say for aoc BF eg vikings. Spanish trade is reduced so imp games are no more decided by one team which is drowning in gold while the other is struggling to get any. In general BF WK is way more balanced than in aoc and if teams are of equal skill then the games usually take longer.WK has imbalances as well, its just that those are different imbalances than AOC. There is no objective proof that WK balance is better than AOC balance. It has more civs, sure but that doesn't mean that the game is more balanced.
And then you woke up.Miss the good old bf days of slapping mbl around and then going on his stream to hear him complain about his team
It does but the difference between the best civs and the worst civs is much smaller than in aoc. Also the most OP units/techs from aoc were balanced pretty well. Half of BF tgs in aoc are decided solely by spanish trade, mangudais or SO vs non SO civs. In wk onagers can cut which nullifies half of the problems which aoc BF has. The other is solved by new units like battle ele etc which can compete with imp powerhouses like celt or mongol. Also the weaker civs have more options to rush since walls are weaker in WK, take more res and time to build and maa do better vs walls/buildings. Plus every civ has now something decent for post imp which you cannot say for aoc BF eg vikings. Spanish trade is reduced so imp games are no more decided by one team which is drowning in gold while the other is struggling to get any. In general BF WK is way more balanced than in aoc and if teams are of equal skill then the games usually take longer.
Thats your "subjective" opinion and I don't want to start discussing opinions.
Any objective proof with substance??
Simple. The number of solid players with experience like Nicov, wakko, teutonic_tanks, Modri or Memb who agree with my post vs one random 15xx player like you. Do I need to say more? You remind me of tocaraca. Always on a crusade vs anyone else.Thats your "subjective" opinion and I don't want to start discussing opinions.
Any objective proof with substance??