I will smurf for john and make sure spioch lose his 50$.
then I bet 100$
Epic riposte :D!
I will smurf for john and make sure spioch lose his 50$.
then I bet 100$
rohit, 1v1?Sletten, you should be searching for your lost wallet rite now, lest you are ****ed up IRL.
and full feudal is just ******ed and not funTommas, map/civs?
De-ja-vu or is this a ctrl+v of what DauT said vs Chris on BO21? 11111I really dont like the idea of you picking my civ. Huns were the strongest race for too long and people dont like changes, but this is not a fun game were you pick my civ. If you really wanted fun setts we can play me byz vs you hun no wall/no tower full feudal since people seem to like setts like those the most.
Similar to Daut's reply to Chris 111I really dont like the idea of you picking my civ. Huns were the strongest race for too long and people dont like changes, but this is not a fun game were you pick my civ. If you really wanted fun setts we can play me byz vs you hun no wall/no tower full feudal since people seem to like setts like those the most.
I only see champs used with Goths, Aztec, Japs and Vikings. Most other civs have better units elsewhere, which makes champions a bad choice.
But those civs without all infantry upgrades got 'bad' champions.
emm what?
why the hell someone would add champs to palas with these civs if they got axes or hcannons?
emm what?
why the hell someone would add champs to palas with these civs if they got axes or hcannons?
emm what?
why the hell someone would add champs to palas with these civs if they got axes or hcannons?
I find that palas + champs is a good combo (+maybe rams or some other siege).
It requires too many (expensive) upgrades, though. So it is only a post-imp combo imo, and that is why you may opt for hc's which you get w/ chemistry. If your eco allows palas, and your race is blessed w/ hc's.
''Huns were the strongest race for too long and people dont like changes, but this is not a fun game were you pick my civ.''
eeeeer....... call me noob ('cause I am), but aren't Huns STILL considered the strongest race?
Brits got nice champs, if you see the wakko pack they were used very seldomly.
Thing is champs die to archers and die to knight line. They are excellent killing trash. Thing is, most of games opponent have kts or x bow so is pointless to do champ vs them. Only if you know he will eew, as they counter them well.
emm what?
why the hell someone would add champs to palas with these civs if they got axes or hcannons?