Caluna your analogy is flawed. The situation would be that originally L_clan can win if the dice rolls a 6, but now someone is saying, oh actually you can win if you roll a 2, 4, or 6, thus they are being given a lot more chance to win than they originally had.
Let's put it in a chess situation, say 2 players are in a position where one has a pawn and a king left and the other has pretty much all pieces left (unlikely I know, but it's just an analogy). A bird then swoops down and ruins the game, of course they would put the pieces back and carry on, however that is not an option because the whole board and pieces were destroyed. They are unable to get another chess set and so declare the person in the lead is declared the winner.
Originally I thought this sounded unfair because you can say that L_clan still had a chance to win, but Buga stirred my mathematical side which I had ignored, and then I realised it's just a matter of %'s. The fact is if you start a new game, in theory L_clan has a 50% chance to win, whereas in the original game the % was considerably lower than that, at least less than 33.3 etc% chance to win (which is important). By being less than 33.3 if you restart a new game, you are giving more benefit to L_clan and more disadvantage to RVK than is reasonable % wise. Therefore statistically it is only fair to declare RVK winner.
MY ONLY OTHER SUGGESTION COULD BE:
RVK and L_clan rematch GR but they play it 5 times, if RVK wins just one of them then they get the point, L_clan has to win all 5 to get the point.
Let's put it in a chess situation, say 2 players are in a position where one has a pawn and a king left and the other has pretty much all pieces left (unlikely I know, but it's just an analogy). A bird then swoops down and ruins the game, of course they would put the pieces back and carry on, however that is not an option because the whole board and pieces were destroyed. They are unable to get another chess set and so declare the person in the lead is declared the winner.
Originally I thought this sounded unfair because you can say that L_clan still had a chance to win, but Buga stirred my mathematical side which I had ignored, and then I realised it's just a matter of %'s. The fact is if you start a new game, in theory L_clan has a 50% chance to win, whereas in the original game the % was considerably lower than that, at least less than 33.3 etc% chance to win (which is important). By being less than 33.3 if you restart a new game, you are giving more benefit to L_clan and more disadvantage to RVK than is reasonable % wise. Therefore statistically it is only fair to declare RVK winner.
MY ONLY OTHER SUGGESTION COULD BE:
RVK and L_clan rematch GR but they play it 5 times, if RVK wins just one of them then they get the point, L_clan has to win all 5 to get the point.