Quiller, where is ur "2" digit came from? How did u got it? Maths not ftw?
-L Clan has no honor, they should get penality point for "cowardly atempt" to get chance for a new game, using stupid arguments.
chances of legion winning shortly before the crash : x%, where x is bigger than 0.iRead my whole post again, and try to understand it this time, please. I said all that already - we do not know if RVK would win in the end (if Legion would lose or win), and we can only assume they could win or lose. The only thing we do know (not an assumption) is that RVK had an advantage when the game froze, and that the game can`t be restored - and those are the only relevant facts we should act upon. We could (1) disadvantage RVK for sure (by restarting the game, as they already had an advantage), or (2) maybe disadvantage Legion (as they might have been able to recover, but might not... and probably not, but that is irrelevant). Not to repeat myself, read my post again.dont quite agree with your logic here. legion would be disadvantaged by rvk admin win, because we can't be 100% sure that they would have lost the game. that is not an assumption, it is a fact, since it is a fact that we cant predict the future. it doesnt matter if chances were 10% or 0000.1 %. in the end legion would be disadvantaged.
Not even relevant to my post. If you actually read, you would see I was generalising about what should be done in similar circumstances, I already agreed that an AW is ok for this particular game. As for whether you're qualified to be assessing others' intelligence... well, I'm not sure I need to say anything.Plz stop posting, you think you are smart but you are not. Case is as easy as can be. Expert would give L clan LESS then 5 % chance to win. 45%/5% = 9.
RVK value 9 L clan value 1. This is when you estimate L clan is gonna win 5% which most agree is even LESS.
Even if you give L clan 10% case is easy as can be. But i assume, and i'm 99% sure, you are a dumbass who still doesnt understand this nor do are you even able to make a proper guess how game would have ended. So council decision should be just to ignore dumbasses like you and not even waste time respond to you.
"You're trying to paint a decision as an absolute, that is my complaint."
"That knowing the winner beforehand doesn't matter. Games should run to completion. Or you might as well skip half of the WCL games. (And yet, we don't really know). I really can't get it clearer than that."
"but eventually after all restarts are exhausted you're inclined to face the fact that a team gets more luck than the other in those (you hope) rare cases. So I ask you here, isn't a crash like this that happens once in a million games one of those extreme cases we're resigned to accept?"
Just to name some of your 'intelligent' remarks. And thats just 1 minute of reading your 'intelligent' replies.
whereas merely discussing said game is quite the ***** magnet ^^Could this place be any more of a ***** repellant? Using math and statistics to debate about a game played by some "experts" of a game about history?
Can lead to situations like:
"Game crashed. Not our fault. They had the all gold middle, but we weren't losing!!! Rematch!"
Ares, I can't agree with you anymore. Admin needs technical methods to determine if game crashed intentionally or not.Sure it will -- but you can't prove it. It's not the more obvious ones like resource/map hack, but something completely different. Games crash. You can't blame every crash on a cheat.
Can lead to situations like:
"Game crashed. Not our fault. They had the all gold middle, but we weren't losing!!! Rematch!"
give rvk the advantage they had nothing more(AW) nothing less(replay)
if its possible recreate the game with scenario editor :lol:
or play 2 or more games (depending on how big rvk's advantage is) where rvk needs to win only 1 game in order to win 1 point