I think the decision is correct.
In a "real life" court case you can't prove someone guilty unless there are clear evidences of a crime. But in our case you can't very often expect any evidence becasue so is the nature of a "crime" (cheating or manipulating with the score). So the only reasonable guidance is just common sence, which admins used.
My common sence also tells me that tim and happyhappy deliberately did what they did, are guilty and deserve punishment.
It is debatable what kind of punishment should it be but it would have anyway influenced the outcome of the group stage for both players one way or another. Sad but fair
In a "real life" court case you can't prove someone guilty unless there are clear evidences of a crime. But in our case you can't very often expect any evidence becasue so is the nature of a "crime" (cheating or manipulating with the score). So the only reasonable guidance is just common sence, which admins used.
My common sence also tells me that tim and happyhappy deliberately did what they did, are guilty and deserve punishment.
It is debatable what kind of punishment should it be but it would have anyway influenced the outcome of the group stage for both players one way or another. Sad but fair