Re: New Expansion (updated 30 Oct: Video added)
Message Removed
Ur either **** or u need to read that again.
Message Removed
Ur either **** or u need to read that again.
I'd have one idea if u really want to make "longswords" more used..
make 2hand sword man upgrade avaible in castle.. (ok then it wouldnt be longswords anymore 11)
I think 2hand wouldnt be sooo overpowered in castle age cuz xbow or ca still easily kill them...
but lets face it.. noone gonna spend 200food and 75gold for the longswordupgrade..
and then pay 60f and 20gold for a shitty unit, losing to everything 11
I think you gonna do a big misakte with with this:
Hungarians:
"no halbardier, no caml,no elit shkirm"
Seriously: what will you able to do in late imp iwth them? Enemy just mass halbardiers, and he won. They have only that magyar husszar unit, which is good, but still they will be useless..
And they also dead vs heavy mounted units like paladins. NO halb, no camel, even vik and aztek sucking much vs it.
Ur either ***** or u need to read that again.
Message removed
Ur either ***** or u need to read that again.
Message removed
Oh right so didn't u read it again then. There was no suggestion of a counter unit to a counter unit. UR just ****.
You are taking too many liberties with the word "******ed" mister :roll: .
But let's forget that, 2H-Swords in Castle age seems like a fiar decision, now tose guys would finally see some action. They might be a tad bit too powerful, but that could be easily taken care off by reducing their attack or HP just a tiny, tiny little bit.
I didn't have to read that **** again as I understand that the whole idea is stupid, ***********, speaking of "reality" just makes you look ****** actually. But congratz with this squires idea, it is even dumber than the one discussed, ****** ^.^ If u don't like anything I said here, just read it again. trolololoooYou are taking too many liberties with the word "******ed" mister :roll: .
But let's forget that, 2H-Swords in Castle age seems like a fiar decision, now tose guys would finally see some action. They might be a tad bit too powerful, but that could be easily taken care off by reducing their attack or HP just a tiny, tiny little bit.
Well I don't hold the sense of ******ed as in mentally handicapped by no fault of his own. He's ******ed in the sense he only sees what he wants to see, and it holds him back from seeing the reality of it. I told him to read it again.
Hmmm 2nd swords in castle, I can see that being OP too, vikes late castle push would own. IMO best balance is a slight speed boost to LS so they can chase down pikes/skirms easier (as they are meant to bangout, gold units that aren't the object of the counter unit r meant to counter those counter units (******).) or the +1 PA.
Squires should factor in the speed boost, so once u have champs+squires its the same speed as now. Or 2hnd swrds(or champs) could be slower than LS. Actually keeping 2ndswd faster seems fair too.
Thinking this through, how about make squires cost 75-150 food and perhaps reduce research time. Seems much more simple, and won't OP celts or change the balance on civs that lack squires on purpose (franks).
This thread alone will bring down aoczone.net and voobly.com! Which tells you that this expansion is bigger than the community can handle :lol:
i think this topic should recieve classical status