Ezerks with +5 require 10 strikes to kill a paladin.
Paladins require 6 or 7 strikes to kill an ezerk.
Even taking into account things like different radius, speed, etc, i hardly see how ezerks can win.
But anyway, I sincerely don't know whether +3 is better balanced than +5, so I let Cysion and his team decide, i'm sure they'll make the right choice.
Paladins require 6 or 7 strikes to kill an ezerk.
Even taking into account things like different radius, speed, etc, i hardly see how ezerks can win.
Same test and same results for me.Carlos Ferdinand said:I even tried patrolling 40 ezerk(with +5) vs 30 AI paladins and they still lost. and the patrol was good. 40 v 40 paladins won very clearly. (20+ remain)
But anyway, I sincerely don't know whether +3 is better balanced than +5, so I let Cysion and his team decide, i'm sure they'll make the right choice.