Chrazini hasn't nearly as influence as Hera has.? What in the f is this post even supposed to mean lmao.
I could literally have only read Chrazini's side of the story (which in fact was the first one I read, followed up by Hera's tweet just to know context) and I would still think the wrong decision was taken here. Stop trying to display Chrazini as a victim here. His opening to the thread is just as bad as Hera's tweet when it comes to calling someone out if not worse, as Hera only shared his opinion on what he considered a bad admin decision (and I did too, from the moment I read Chrazini's version). You can already see it's effect on people on this thread alone, you being one of them. Hera might be a person with influence on this community, but so is Chrazini.
Feels like I'm answering to an obvious troll at this point.
The situation is also quite different: Chrazini has been attacked. He has to defend. He didn't have the initiative of attacking. Both Belgium and Hera, according to posts here, promoted witchhunt against Chrazini in some way. What's Chrazini supposed to do? Obviously he gotta expose his point.
It's common knowledge that a defense to a public attack has to be made as publicly.
You saying "stop trying to display Chrazini as a victim" already shows for whom you stand. Nothing against you, but you don't have the right of calling me a troll, lol.