Thank you for the honest answer.Not happy but seeding potentially 100+ players is impossible for us.
While I feel this would be ideal it may be too late to push this. Maybe the event should have been announced a number of weeks earlier so that such steps could be taken.In a way I think it makes sense that other ladders would impact DM rating, as some form of correlation is there for sure - it can be argued how strong it is but at least some of RM skill translates to DM skill. Maybe a requirement of more than afaik 10 games on the DM ladder could help, as than the performance in the DM games could have a higher impact?
Agreed the Current Arabia Is pretty Trash it has many huge cliffs which creates choke points for fights and it is very annoying and iritating it riuns the fun of game and DM was always meant to play open maps .Those cliffs do nothing other than creating Choke Holds.replace arabia with green arabia and if its possible make green version of the rest of the maps
Agreed on that too.Just a thought.
Are the organisers happy with the elo system's catch up mechanic allowing highly ranked rm and tg players get highly ranked with a small number of games.
I note particularly a chinese player (I believe vivi) rank 2 dm after 10 games. I also note daut rank 51 with 11 games 6 wins and 5 losses. Nacho_10 rank 61 off 2 wins and 9 losses.
Are the organisers happy to use this ranking system for seeding which seems so easy for someone to get ranking on based on their performance on other ladders.