source?https://aoestats.io/stats?elo=2000+#?orderby=-win_rate
Koreans one of the worst win ratio for 2000+ rating yet they remove their +1 range on towers just because some VIPs got their ass kicked by MBL or VIVI tower rushes.
What ? Have you been seeing things ?https://aoestats.io/stats?elo=2000+#?orderby=-win_rate
Koreans one of the worst win ratio for 2000+ rating yet they remove their +1 range on towers just because some VIPs got their ass kicked by MBL or VIVI tower rushes.
Below. Every stat is in the page. Also, you can click in the civ and take a look thereHello, I have a question ... in the statistics of all civilizations, the rate appears against most 4 civilizations won and most 4 civilizations lost ... but if I want to see the rate compared to other civilizations that are not those 8, how I get it?
Click right there on "win rate" my little friendi mean, if i want to see the win rate of aztecs vs any civs except khemer saracens indians portuguese slavs huns incas franks, how i get it? i cant find it haha 24
View attachment 163738
For 2k+ each civ has around 300 games, so assuming it is all played on random civs that's about 10 games on average for each matchup. It easily explains extreme values in individual matchups.It would be super nice if sample size was easily avaliable somewhere. When filtering by 2000 elo, some civs have 100% winrate vs others, which I assume is due to a very low sample size in the afformentioned matchup. Having a column for samplesize somewhere on the civ-page itself next to win% would be great ^^
My point exactly. Of course sample size is the explanation, but knowing exactly how small, or big, the sample size is could be a useful bit of information. Maybe a button to toggle it if it proves to be too clustering?For 2k+ each civ has around 300 games, so assuming it is all played on random civs that's about 10 games on average for each matchup. It easily explains extreme values in individual matchups.
This does not show the winrate against other civs, just takes you back to the average winrates of civs.Click right there on "win rate" my little friend
Yes, you are exactly right.A bit late to the party.
Wonderful website!!!!! I couldn't stress it enough.
Now, I'm a noob when it comes to stats so just to clarify through the following example:
When I see that Incas have a high win rate below 20 minutes, it means that they tend to win matches through early feudal rushes? (as opposed to franks, who get stronger past the 20 minutes mark and get their knights running) It would make sense since the Incas are a very strong towers + men-at-arms rush civilization thanks to their bonuses.
It is certainly a dumb question but I really want to make sure that I read the information properly before I make a fool of myself on my upcoming Inca Civilization video in my AoE2 Crash Course History project. Nobody likes to sound overly stupid on YouTube. I guess...
Many thanks in advance!
View attachment 174452