Huns are overrated (in 1vs1) but they are the most used because its maybe the only civ war that is not only walling + booming, that make people think they're best, since nobody cares much about other civs. Now that they find the way to make CA overpowered they are clearly 2nd best choice, but 2 years ago they were 5th best arabia civ or around. I think aztks are best and i still have doubs about hun being better than Mayans or Celts. Same from viks, they can easily lose at many water maps and in many they lose to hun or even mayans (imo for example, huns are better than viks in baltic). The most important change would be balancing some units and the cost of some buildings (for example, make paladise walls more expensive)some of you guys should look up the definition of a PATCH. The game is broken (as in NOT balanced). One civ triumphs too much over the other civs. Thats is not good for any RTS. For eg. SC2 has been out for only a month, and they are patching it coz 1 race (t) is overpowered and kill other races too easy. Out of 18 civs how many can stand upto Huns (on arab) or viks (on water) ??? yeah ... what i thgt too.
I'm all for a new patch.