WW are great in large numbers, they kill everything, I envy you if you think they are bad as you probable never had to fight a post imp korea 24.
Make it 153 votes, I'd still select WWs. I don't see how having my own (justified) opinion makes any difference to how many people voted whatever.Well, I gave reasons for my vote, perhaps you'd like to justify ''awesome'' in a similar manner.
Out of 53 votes, you are the only one that selected war wagons. There are way worse options in that list. Have you ever had a group of more than 20 fully upgraded war wagons with some halbs in front of them? GL stopping that.
Is that how YOU vote? Checking out 1st how many votes each option has?
And if ''awesome'' is justified by you, 'cause you let the Korean reach imperial AND w/ castle AND mass 20 WWs,
well that doesn't happen a lot in 1vs1 or 2vs2 either. Any1 correct me here if I'm wrong.
Not to mention that ALL trash is good vs WWs.
And in big TGs that Korea DOES actually reach imp, I'd be more afraid of their BBTs and SO, rather than their WWs.
In tg war wagons can be really beast just because they Are hard to kill, even being resistant to onager shots somewhat and very resistant to archers. They make a very good shield to put in front of your awesome siege onagers. Yes they can be killed using skirms and halbs, but not fast. They hang around before they die and absorb archer fire like rams do. For 1v1 they're ok, just make an initial mass of them but if they die don't keep wasting gold rebuilding the war wag army.
There a bit expensive for castle age, just too much wood. They are formidable in castle age since lot of crushing is done using xbows but they just cost too much wood.
Hmmm I think elite berserkers be good for 1v1 late game but not that good in t. They die to palla, cavalier, cata, archer and, scorps and onagers, hand cannon, jap and Aztec infantry, and their healing doesn't count for much since tg have constant action. In mass they are ok vs civs like goth but just not very useful.
Hmmm if war wagons can be put on the list why not war else (I don't believe either of them belong in the list here) if the judgement is so tough? The sheer cost of else's means you can't really rely on them for crushing at all, **** no, and not even at 32 or so mins when the fights following boom start.
I dont even want to know why, you put mameluke in this poll :S. They are side by side with mangudai, the most powerful unit in the game!
11I dont even want to know why, you put mameluke in this poll :S. They are side by side with mangudai, the most powerful unit in the game!
Yeah, i wanted to see if somebody is so stupid to vote for them :P
and someone was it :lol:
@ -Melkor first i thought about a Mandugai, but that had been too obvious, so i decided for mame
@ -Melkor first i thought about a Mandugai, but that had been too obvious, so i decided for mame
im sure that if you concentrated well enough, you couldve found more UU that are better contenders for worst UU than mame's and mangudai xd
tim vs stark on migration:When was the last time you saw a turtle ship in action in a decent game? Or a longboat?
Berserks
Requires castle
Requires useless UT
Not much better than vik champs
No nieche like woad raider or samurai
Expensive upgrade