Because once you get it you are partially able to play any civ, because huns encompasses the most.from what experts have said in the past, arabia huns is the simplest form of learning rm.
What exactly does it encompass that's not in other civs?Because once you get it you are partially able to play any civ, because huns encompasses the most.from what experts have said in the past, arabia huns is the simplest form of learning rm.
so, you'd think that a hun war is less complex than a turks war on arabia?
The game can go anywhere, and with no houses and good cavalry, games are "generally" less about walling and running around with xbows and mangenols; and more about raiding effectively and having really stressful games at full pace. Other civs are more relaxing. And anyway huns are one of the most versatile civs so if you play huns enough you've learned the "majority" of main strategies and macro and micro.What exactly does it encompass that's not in other civs?Because once you get it you are partially able to play any civ, because huns encompasses the most.from what experts have said in the past, arabia huns is the simplest form of learning rm.
i think it's a good one for learners mostly cause of the no house, which gives more time to concentrate on other stuff
Meanwhile you can have fun stone walling and booming for EWW and SO every game you play as korea.
No need to be korea to tower defence, just ask MbL! He'll probably provide you with an awesome BO.Meanwhile you can have fun stone walling and booming for EWW and SO every game you play as korea.
So no Tower Defense Simulator option for the Koreans?
Now tell me more about how huns are more versatile than other civs. As soon as the game reaches the castle age, there are exacty 3 possible units: Xbows, kts, CA. In Imperial just Pala, HCA. Trash and siege as needed, but that applies for every civ.What exactly does it encompass that's not in other civs?
i think it's a good one for learners mostly cause of the no house, which gives more time to concentrate on other stuff
The game can go anywhere, and with no houses and good cavalry, games are "generally" less about walling and running around with xbows and mangenols; and more about raiding effectively and having really stressful games at full pace. Other civs are more relaxing. And anyway huns are one of the most versatile civs so if you play huns enough you've learned the "majority" of main strategies and macro and micro.
Play any other civ repeatedly and you will find it doesn't have as much content as huns. Variety from huns is the best way to play, but saying that hun wars are boring themselves is absurd. Its just the most content available civ being overplayed because its the most content available civ.'
John the Late said:Now tell me more about how huns are more versatile than other civs. As soon as the game reaches the castle age, there are exacty 3 possible units: Xbows, kts, CA. In Imperial just Pala, HCA. Trash and siege as needed, but that applies for every civ.
I think that there are far more versatile civs than the Huns, which lack just too much to be called versatile. No arbalesters, no gunpowder whatsoever, no camels, no champions, not even onagers, no hscorps, bad monks and university. Civs like Persians, or especially Byzantines seem far more versatile to me, no?