We can`t count on them to come to an agreement because this is $$$ tournament and people do crazy things for money. The point is that if one team wants to hear opponent`s pick and then make his choice (because he can`t use all the players, but need to separate them in two 2 player teams), without a rule both team could wait forever, and the best thing we could do would be to penalize them both - which is not a solution.Buga i think you are trying to solve tooo much and in fact you dont have to solve this.The only thing you have to do is give them the rules......2x2v2s,just play them before the deadline.How they ll come to an agreement and how they ll make their teams is their problem.Same thing for the 1v1s.Just give them the map,the setts and the deadline.They ll choose who plays what.And in fact,i cant see where the problem is.For example:whatever player a team chooses to play a map,lclan will always choose ruso to play water maps.same thing in arabia.they ll always pick chris.lclan is just an example.
I agree, 4v4 Oasis would be great. Assuming the teams are evenly matched, it's like two 2v2 games for the first hour, then an all in orgy afterwards. Everybody loves an orgy.
Thats why we allow more than one team...so the lesser skilled players in a clan can enter in their clans 2nd team which aint as competitive and everyone on that team could have a shot
Not really "not playing", but just paying attention to economy (slinger) or military (slinged) is much easier than doing both at the same time. It wouldn`t be good to have matches being decided because one player is much better, and with sling, killing all others.
We might discuss this rule further, please post your opinions and thoughts here, pros and cons.
so what is the conclusion? sling still banned?