+1.. dev wanted everyone to play it on GR instead of voobly.. it should have been released on voobly/gr simultaneously ...
Also, when voobly took so long to integrate a proper rating system, most FE gamers went to gameranger.
Also, when voobly took so long to integrate a proper rating system, most FE gamers went to gameranger.
You are wrong, the current GR AOFE players are not former Voobly players but new players or former AOC GR players.
Even the Voobly's New Players Lobby would be a challenge for them.
AoFE is a real fine effort and I seriously doubt most of you critics have really given it its fair share.
AoC has become a Hun whore/Maya bitch game, since these 2 civs see most action 1vs1. Made other like 16 civs like Sara or Korean completely obsolete.
And imo a 2nd UT is a nice touch.
Just because stg is ''classic'' doesn't mean it's perfect. Hence it can be improved.
Play whatever you like, hf, but don't be unjust. Peace!
Voobly never organized the big tournaments though
It was just a client to play the game.
If AoFE appeals to the people who sponsor the tournaments, then you might get them...
a lot of people are accusing people based on the wrong assumptions.
step 1: find a game that is actually an improvement and doesn't have glaring flaws
step 2: come up with accusations for why people don't play it
you've jumped to step 2 without doing step 1...
You really need to learn how to respect people....AoFE is a real fine effort and I seriously doubt most of you critics have really given it its fair share.
AoC has become a Hun whore/Maya bitch game, since these 2 civs see most action 1vs1. Made other like 16 civs like Sara or Korean completely obsolete.
And imo a 2nd UT is a nice touch.
Just because stg is ''classic'' doesn't mean it's perfect. Hence it can be improved.
Play whatever you like, hf, but don't be unjust. Peace!
bitch please :lol: i koreans chinese,sarra are worst civs in aofe, goths are number 1 now if you abuse their infantry bonus but anyways i don't care about that just saying the changes they made to make it balanced killed the whole project, stop deny it, if aofe devs would care about community they will revert those noobs changes but then again they only care for noob ppl so keep it alive in GR i don't give a **** for them like they don't do it for aoc ommunity so its ok.
We can still do something like this if people want it. The mutli-ladder system works like that for CS and we offered to do the same for RM but most people said they did not want it.I think I've posted this somewhere else but here goes:Voobly needs to change its rating systems in such a way that playing less popular maps and less popular civs on common maps gives a significantly higher rating.This will discourage Hun-whoring and make the less played with civs more popular.
Yeah even I found that to be a bit odd. I like the idea of having them together as that lounge usually has a total of 10 players, splitting them wont help with that much at all. The name could be better though.The cognition that voobly have made same loungue namely AoFE - Age of chivarly alone explains how AoFE is being treated by voobly.
I am sorry, but I totally disagree.Because it's not the real game... unofficial fan expansion is gay.
Because it's not the real game... unofficial fan expansion is gay.