1v1 azt
tg hun
depends on the player 11, i think daut said that its not the civ that is good/bad, its the player that makes it good or bad. (or it was the map not sure 11)
That's correct, aoc can be funny when u get a set of tactics, issue is aztecs is easier to use it than the dude is huning, often looks like kinda boring.depends on the player
That's correct, aoc can be funny when u get a set of tactics, issue is aztecs is easier to use it than the dude is huning, often looks like kinda boring.depends on the player
Please tell me more...why?If it ain't map with one woood so far and one frwrd gold then aztecs are better.
Idk what is ur level or your rating, but your point is correct too bcuz i was being subjective, atm i don't have enough arguings to refute, However, some time ago Patin named japs as da best civ to counter azt, actually i like it, minuses: aztecs requires less macro.lol Aztec vs hun,the easier civ to use at my level certainly aint Aztec.Plus dont get me started on my success % vs Celt,Celt simply rox vs Aztec...wtf man...11,damn militias.
Huns is the easier civ to play imo.This probably is different at higher level where players know their ****.
True that china can counter a number of combos in imp, but I'm not so sure if they can do so well vs combos that include siege, especially onagers that have siege engineers. What I have in mind are combos like, aztec pikes and champs + SOs, longbow + onagers + some halbs, or perhaps vik pikes + arbs + onagers.finally - every tech line is open for you. china is the ultimate COUNTER civ. no matter what your enemy does, you have something that can counter it, and you can open this tech cheaper than any other civ.