yea but no stone walls at all is bad also. imagine arabia 4v4 imperial age where u have paladins plumes and mangs raiding all over and all u can do is to chase them or go for exchange and raid ennemy also. its going to be too chaotic
When the game is at it's most chaotic is when its at its most fun.
I'd love to see this used in the tournament. It's probably more suitable for 1v1, but as I mentioned above, chaos is the best form of fun in this game.
I hope someday you (and the others guys who think the same that you do) realize that most of the players play a tournament for themselves and not to entertaining the rest providing "funny" games (specially if there is money involved).
Stone walls banned would be a joke.
About sling im 50% 50%.
Of course you play it for yourself, but the tournament is there for the community, there is a reason records, streams etc are provided. The price money is there to give you an incentive to entertain us.
I think banning stonewalls until castle age would be great, because stonewalls in feudal age is what makes slinging so OP, slinging currently is far better then any other strategy. Some sling games are good, but sling in 95% of the games like we will see this tournament with no restrictions might be a bit boring.
Without stonewalls in Feudal age can you still sling, the guy getting slinged just has to make sure he also protects his team mates, which is only logical imo.