I'd be happy that the devs didn't change the Persians. Imagine all the ways somebody could have ****ed them up.
Its not about Huns.Also, why are we seeing fewer and fewer people playing AoFE online? This expansion is superior to AoC in practically every single way. Guess they had to sit through the horror of seeing the Huns being *gasp* BALANCED!!!
don't reply to him, he's just another stupid ass troll who's probably not following the followup comments.
Anyway, replying to Cysion, I just don't buy that the Persians are a complete Civ. With only full pals, and full hand Cannoneers and an average seige, they can be easily countered. But when looked at in the complete timeline which AOK covers, the Persians had one of the best, if not the best militaries of the world. With too many instances of battles to list here, I can only had imagined that atleast 1 proper military bonus was given to them, other then their weak team bonus. And my attittude towards the developers stems from the comment I recieved by one of them on their website which insulted me after I brought up this point over there.
But when looked at in the complete timeline which AOK covers, the Persians had one of the best, if not the best militaries of the world. With too many instances of battles to list here, I can only had imagined that atleast 1 proper military bonus was given to them, other then their weak team bonus. And my attittude towards the developers stems from the comment I recieved by one of them on their website which insulted me after I brought up this point over there.
Well, that and onagers, heavy scorpions and probably hand cannoneers.the only units that the Persians can use against them are elite skirmishers (that are not even FU!).
:lol: i like this postI'M GUATAMALAN AND CLEARLY THE FE DEVS SKIPPED OVER THE MAYA. THEY ONLY HAVE FULL ARCHER AND EAGLES NO CAVALRY THEY ARE EASILY COUNTERED THEIR UT DOESN'T EVEN WORK.
don't reply to him, he's just another stupid ass troll who's probably not following the followup comments.
The only thing stupid I see here is your lame nickname.
Well, Persians have full stable (Paladins, Heavy Camels and Hussars), full Halberdiers, full gunpowder, full navy (missing shipwright & bracer, but having stronger & faster docks), nearly full cavalry archers (missing bracer), all economy upgrades and all siege upgrades except siege onager. On top of that their UU is terrifying if you can eventually make them. Granted, their monks and defensive structures are poor.Anyway, replying to Cysion, I just don't buy that the Persians are a complete Civ. With only full pals, and full hand Cannoneers and an average seige, they can be easily countered. But when looked at in the complete timeline which AOK covers, the Persians had one of the best, if not the best militaries of the world. With too many instances of battles to list here, I can only had imagined that atleast 1 proper military bonus was given to them, other then their weak team bonus. And my attittude towards the developers stems from the comment I recieved by one of them on their website which insulted me after I brought up this point over there.