+1 Even though fullfill the enough squard but most of countries have problem to calling 4 more players on time.4v4 has no place in a nations tournament, most countries can't field a competitive 4v4 team.
You understood viper wrong, he meant that there should be 1v1 and 2v2 in the mix with the 3v3 and 4v4's (there are no 1v1's or 2v2's at all in the tourney settings)+1 Even though fullfill the enough squard but most of countries have problem to calling 4 more players on time.4v4 has no place in a nations tournament, most countries can't field a competitive 4v4 team.
In a row 3v3,4v4 games would be spend much time and make boring to watch. As viper says 1v1 and 2v2 matchs should be considered for more fun tourney. If admins doesn't like that we need vote for sure!
You understood viper wrong, he meant that there should be 1v1 and 2v2 in the mix with the 3v3 and 4v4's (there are no 1v1's or 2v2's at all in the tourney settings)+1 Even though fullfill the enough squard but most of countries have problem to calling 4 more players on time.4v4 has no place in a nations tournament, most countries can't field a competitive 4v4 team.
In a row 3v3,4v4 games would be spend much time and make boring to watch. As viper says 1v1 and 2v2 matchs should be considered for more fun tourney. If admins doesn't like that we need vote for sure!
I wonder when people will understand that a tournament is a tournament and that a potential winner will be the winner of that specific tournament and not the ruler of the world. "2v2 gives better chances for Portugal and Norway *cry* " - Please
Please read Viper's post to see how a true sportsman takes it. Can't remember the last time someone complained about having to send 11 football players for international tournaments. (I feel like we're all getting dumber reading this)
(I feel like we're all getting dumber reading this)
Am i the only one who read vipers post and found him saying that the way it is is the way it should be?
lol
Like seriously...
If its 4v4 then its just going to be another boring group stage with the top 2 teams in the finals, this isn't very entertaining for viewers nor fair for smaller nations as it will just result in China vs Brazil (we all know this)... much like how in WiC you have 2 teams that are so stacked that they basically can't lose (the Tyrants).
It actually upsets me that this tournament is so obviously geared towards the strengths of SY and doesn't take into account the fact that people would love to see 1v1 & 2v2 incorporated to give top players with no decent national team like Viper/Jordan etc a chance to take a weaker team and cause some upsets. Tourneys are for the community as much as for the players and the community obviously wants this ...so why not do it bar the fact that is jeopardises the narrative of China winning their own tournament?
I feel that incorporating some 1v1 & 2v2 and/or banning slinging would be the best format for the following reasons:
> it would give weaker nations a chance and not make it a two horse race
>the community would be happy and get some diversity instead of 4v4 over and over and over again
>we wont see the worst players turtling with stone walls and slinging, they actually have to play
>we wont see the Mayan player getting slung and going fast imp like every game in WiC
>no slinging means that the weaker nations with 1 superstar player don't become OP with mass slinging to their strong player but still have the 1v1 & 2v2 games to get a couple of points on the board
>we get a more diverse and interesting tournament with some interesting matchups that isnt a watered down version of WiC
Am i the only one who read vipers post and found him saying that the way it is is the way it should be?
lol
Like seriously...
??Nicov said:This might be the last NC