In CBA, your 4 castles produce your unique units 4 at a time at the same rate as everyone else, regardless of your civilisation. So which unique unit would be the best in CBA. In other words, which unit is the best when massed? Thanks!
Since the UU will face eachother 1vs1 (equal production rate), the hardest to deal with is the Persian UU.
Real hard to take down.
No monks/halbs to fear, and also a potential threat to opponent's castles.
Since the UU will face eachother 1vs1 (equal production rate), the hardest to deal with is the Persian UU.
Real hard to take down.
No monks/halbs to fear, and also a potential threat to opponent's castles.
Didn't have all the facts... ops:Also to be noted that in CBA, Conquistador, War Elephant and War Wagon are without elite upgrade. This had to be done because nothing can tackle Elite War Elephant 1 to 1 not even Elite Mameluke. Still having persian is very good for the team, saracean good for yourself and huns good for surprise finish. These three stand out.
agurichi you must be quite serious noob if you think elephant is best UU for cba.. since 40mamelukes can kill 100 elephants without losing a single mameluke... (if you do realize what micro is since CBA all it is is just microing
I don't play cba, but the way the first post describes it, I'd think mames would have an issue if the eles were destroying your sara castles. Sara micro wouldn't be worth much if it's limited to the proximity of the castles, not to mention the presence of a Persia ally like China/Brit/Maya, making eles for the sara a nightmare.
But since I don't play it, I'll have you enjoy the benefit of the doubt.
Chill man!
In CBA, your 4 castles produce your unique units 4 at a time at the same rate as everyone else, regardless of your civilisation. So which unique unit would be the best in CBA. In other words, which unit is the best when massed? Thanks!
I think you could explain why you put Spanish on second place. I don't think they're so good to gain that position. If you have any infantary/calvary ally, you can combo with Conquistadors in the back, but alone they aren't so effective. They take ~750 kills to reach Imperialagurichi you must be quite serious noob if you think elephant is best UU for cba.. since 40mamelukes can kill 100 elephants without losing a single mameluke... (if you do realize what micro is since CBA all it is is just microing
+1
even one mameluke can kills 100 elephants without being killed if you give it time.
Mamelukes are the best , apart from their weakness vs arrows. I once lost a 1v1 CBA of Saracens vs Britons.
Usually the units that allows better micro is the best in CBA, as are ranged units.
If i were to make a ranking i'd say:
1 - Saracens
2 - Spanish
3 - Turks
4 - Persian
5 - Byzantines
6 - Huns (if not CBA hero)
7 - Goths (only if you are vs archer civs)
8 - Koreans (if not vs Saracens)
9 - Mongols
10+ - British / Chinese / Franks / Mayan / Japanese / Celts / Teuton
last - Aztec / Vikings
Huns and Goths are very situational.
Korean in some way too, if one of your opponents has Saracens its gg.
Teuton are sometimes usefull, but you are always late on the spot, you spent a lot of the game traveling while others fight.
In CBA HERO this differences are much more important tough.
I think you could explain why you put Spanish on second place. I don't think they're so good to gain that position. If you have any infantary/calvary ally, you can combo with Conquistadors in the back, but alone they aren't so effective. They take ~750 kills to reach Imperialagurichi you must be quite serious noob if you think elephant is best UU for cba.. since 40mamelukes can kill 100 elephants without losing a single mameluke... (if you do realize what micro is since CBA all it is is just microing
+1
even one mameluke can kills 100 elephants without being killed if you give it time.
Mamelukes are the best , apart from their weakness vs arrows. I once lost a 1v1 CBA of Saracens vs Britons.
Usually the units that allows better micro is the best in CBA, as are ranged units.
If i were to make a ranking i'd say:
1 - Saracens
2 - Spanish
3 - Turks
4 - Persian
5 - Byzantines
6 - Huns (if not CBA hero)
7 - Goths (only if you are vs archer civs)
8 - Koreans (if not vs Saracens)
9 - Mongols
10+ - British / Chinese / Franks / Mayan / Japanese / Celts / Teuton
last - Aztec / Vikings
Huns and Goths are very situational.
Korean in some way too, if one of your opponents has Saracens its gg.
Teuton are sometimes usefull, but you are always late on the spot, you spent a lot of the game traveling while others fight.
In CBA HERO this differences are much more important tough.
And why is Japanese in the position 10... They have attack bonus vs unic units... and all we have in the start of CBA is unic units.
The position 10 should be expanded, based in my experience:I think you could explain why you put Spanish on second place. I don't think they're so good to gain that position. If you have any infantary/calvary ally, you can combo with Conquistadors in the back, but alone they aren't so effective. They take ~750 kills to reach Imperialagurichi you must be quite serious noob if you think elephant is best UU for cba.. since 40mamelukes can kill 100 elephants without losing a single mameluke... (if you do realize what micro is since CBA all it is is just microing
+1
even one mameluke can kills 100 elephants without being killed if you give it time.
Mamelukes are the best , apart from their weakness vs arrows. I once lost a 1v1 CBA of Saracens vs Britons.
Usually the units that allows better micro is the best in CBA, as are ranged units.
If i were to make a ranking i'd say:
1 - Saracens
2 - Spanish
3 - Turks
4 - Persian
5 - Byzantines
6 - Huns (if not CBA hero)
7 - Goths (only if you are vs archer civs)
8 - Koreans (if not vs Saracens)
9 - Mongols
10+ - British / Chinese / Franks / Mayan / Japanese / Celts / Teuton
last - Aztec / Vikings
Huns and Goths are very situational.
Korean in some way too, if one of your opponents has Saracens its gg.
Teuton are sometimes usefull, but you are always late on the spot, you spent a lot of the game traveling while others fight.
In CBA HERO this differences are much more important tough.
And why is Japanese in the position 10... They have attack bonus vs unic units... and all we have in the start of CBA is unic units.
The position 10 should be expanded, based in my experience:I think you could explain why you put Spanish on second place. I don't think they're so good to gain that position. If you have any infantary/calvary ally, you can combo with Conquistadors in the back, but alone they aren't so effective. They take ~750 kills to reach Imperial+1
even one mameluke can kills 100 elephants without being killed if you give it time.
Mamelukes are the best , apart from their weakness vs arrows. I once lost a 1v1 CBA of Saracens vs Britons.
Usually the units that allows better micro is the best in CBA, as are ranged units.
If i were to make a ranking i'd say:
1 - Saracens
2 - Spanish
3 - Turks
4 - Persian
5 - Byzantines
6 - Huns (if not CBA hero)
7 - Goths (only if you are vs archer civs)
8 - Koreans (if not vs Saracens)
9 - Mongols
10+ - British / Chinese / Franks / Mayan / Japanese / Celts / Teuton
last - Aztec / Vikings
Huns and Goths are very situational.
Korean in some way too, if one of your opponents has Saracens its gg.
Teuton are sometimes usefull, but you are always late on the spot, you spent a lot of the game traveling while others fight.
In CBA HERO this differences are much more important tough.
And why is Japanese in the position 10... They have attack bonus vs unic units... and all we have in the start of CBA is unic units.
Aztecs > Goths, Vikings, Celts
Japanese > Aztecs (withou Garland Wars), Celts, Goths, Vikings
Teutons > Aztecs, Goths, Vikings, Celts, Japaneses