Computers are evolving, so is the collective human intellect.
Computers are evolving, so is the collective human intellect.
For exemple when people use God to explain something real. Then it starts to matter.
@ razzzor1234(the god of noobs in India):
Yes demons,you call them gods,there are thousands of them in hinduism,and since your culture worship cows you shouldnt be suprised much about that.
This clearly shows what a dim witted nut case you are, just like all other creationist weirdos. No comments on this.
Stop posting those meaningles links, someone could actualy think there are some evidences for evolution there.
As I may have already told you in my first reply, I am pretty sure you won't go through the links and carefully assess evidence as you simply don't have the brain power to do that. Your brain simply can't process quality information as it is already filled with creationist cow dung.
Definitely most of the people who browse this form will find that my links have authority, and urs are just drawn from creationist sites (so far only one source, the Hovind website). You are making this too easy for me, almost all of my links have been from Wikipedia. That will prove something to most clear headed people.
All your ''evidences'' prove only micro evolution
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macro_evolution
In this Wiki article, there is a heading called 'Misuse'. Please read that paragraph, which says how creationists are misusing the term marcoevolution.
lets see again what evolution guru says about that
If you only know Richard Dawkins as an Evolution guru, you are living in PreCambrian and you are a trilobite granny. There are hundreds of evolution gurus out there and Richard is just one of them.
btw, thanks for pointing out this link. Guys do check out this link provided to us generously by realistik
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjxZ6MrBl9E&feature=fvst
This is basically my answer to you too, realistik, Thanks.
To your second 'hoax stumped' video which you are making a great deal of fuss about (btw, this shows that you are just a beginner in this field. Veteran creationists don't use this anymore as they know its utterly useless now). This is Richard Dawkins himself answering to that:
http://www.skeptics.com.au/publications ... challenge/
This just proves that your dad just confessed that you are his neighbor's son.If Darwin knew genetics he would never wrote this theory.
And your links about ants ,bears... acctualy proves they were always the same
WRONG. It proves the evolutionary history of these animals. Just to be clear this is the rough evolutionary history of humans: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_evolution
You wont find ant with crocodile tail or something.....................they are always be dears.
WRONG. Usual creationist garbage. Link again: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_selection
About how old earth is,Ex. your carbon dating method is not reliable at all, as nomuerous cases show, diferent parts of same fosil are often carbon dated thousands of years in diference.
WRONG. Age of earth is nearly 4.5 billion years.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
Carbon dating is just one of the several methods to calculate huge time spans including the age of earth as this link will show.
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-age-of-earth.html
Believe what you want,just wanted to people see diferent opinion.Wasted my time...
You have already wasted a considerable part of your worthless life believing in creationism. I am really sorry to my fellow AOCers that they had to endure your creationist ****.. This was such a wonderful topic created by Imperial god, contaminated by your junk. Of course you can believe any **** you want, but don't post them publicly in our forum please. I am not engaging you with any amount of pleasure, but I guess somebody will have to speak out the truth when guys like you start to spread lies.
I think realstik just stated some facts about Hinduism. I have taken world religion in high school and I am also taking it in my university. I am only taking it to see people's perspectives about creation and life from different cultures. I read on multiple places that there are thousands of gods in Hinduism and cow is considered holy in that religion..
As someone stated that the universe is expanding. If the limits of the size of a system are not known, expansion can still be defined regionally in terms of the distance between things (like galaxies) increasing at a rate proportional to their separation - even if its size is unlimited. That is what is observed.
On a side note, I am not sure why people using Wikipedia links as their source... According to Wikipedia, "The Wikipedia model allows anyone to edit, and relies on a large number of well-intentioned editors to overcome issues raised by a smaller number of problematic editors. It is inherent in Wikipedia's editing model that misleading information can be added."
After all, creationist founded most of the branches of modern science ,a sample: Physics: Newton, Faraday, Maxwell, Kelvin. Chemistry: Boyle, Dalton, Ramsay. Biology: Ray, Linnaeus, Mendel, Pasteur, Virchow, Agassiz. Geology: Steno, Woodward, Brewster, Buckland, Cuvier. Astronomy: Copernicus, Galileo, Kepler, Herschel, Maunder. Mathematics: Pascal, Leibnitz.
about how old earth is,Ex. your carbon dating method is not reliable at all, as nomuerous cases show, diferent parts of same fosil are often carbon dated thousands of years in diference.