In my opinion, he (them) got his (their) punishment, they were disqualified. Those that were around at the time remember the argument that arose around that case, discussing if everything was by the rules... It may even be one of the things that eventually closed AoCGroup, as lot of people were dissatisfied with the staff decision.
I think that there is no logic to punish them twice, no? I hope the lesson has been learned.
StorM_Country said:Germany A was kicked from NC because of that incident and no $$ was involved.
NC2 didn`t have the money at the moment Germany was disqualified. Money appeared in the end, around the Final match playing time, as someone wanted to donate.NC2 had money prize.StorM_Country said:Germany A was kicked from NC because of that incident and no $$ was involved.
They made him win money. And punishment usually depends on the result (deed done) - it is not the same if you tried to kill someone, and if you actually kill someone. It is not the same if Cain tried to get the money, and having him get the money.But the ban is totally subjective since Cain won money. If cain wouldnt had won money, Riut and Dog wouldn't be punished, when the act is the same.
Sorck also smurfed in wcls and never got punished and i can easily go on if i see Dog and Riut are punished. Its ridiculous to make Dog and Riut pay before tourney for something they didnt take. U know how much is 200$ dollars for 2 brazilian teenagers? Ridiculous. If they pay after tourney i can agree. If it is before Im like 100% sure they wont play. C'mon _lk_skywalker is 1800s at his best, he never reached castle vs me in like 25 games and for that you ban Riut.