plz critique this strange tactic

[itchywrangler]

This is a game that one player on my team has made me furious, its a BF game with a NR time of 40 min the player is {rush}Parry, spent time in the closing stages of the game calling his team noobs, stupid & so on he is a good player that is he plays in above avg games this one is played at GR.
My take on his stratergy is that he plays quite selfishly, 45 min into the game he still has no army while he has 199 villages to mass his eco, while this may seem ok, it really sacrifices his flank at the hight of the game when its at its chaotic best, my gripe is that he cant do anything to defend his flank till he gets an army up leaving his mate to do all the defending. could you plz critique this stratergy does it show good sence, whats your view?

 

[the_Dragon]

NR 40 minute?
I won't even watch, but yes very selfish tactic in any other setting. It's also a stupid tactic, I've seen players resign because their teammate does stupid things like that in other maps. Me too!

But then again, NR 40 minute. Gives you some leeway - if the player doing 45 minutes of boom really trusts his flank, it could be OK.

 

[Gentle]

if enemy is somewhat decent then they will easily win 2v1 on nr45 :/

 

[Aguruchi]

Yeah, 2vs1 after a 40min boom is like shootin' fish in a barrel - real easy.
Exceptions may be:
Goth (units created so fast it's like having 2 players there), or maaaaybe
Turk (superb BBT and BCs). Or maybe
Chinese w/ Great Wall +onies behind it to fight off petards..
Koreans maybe...BTs+SOs....I dunno... could buy some time..
It's a matter of how fast you can produce your army, and hold your position.

PS. W/o warning to prepare in advance, it's gg 4 any civ.