I'm not sure how you figure that, but shows how little knowledge you have of a 20 year old game...they did not
The guy you are talking to is 18+ DM 1v1 DE, just saying...I'm not sure how you figure that, but shows how little knowledge you have of a 20 year old game...
Persians vs Mongols (Mongols has advantage, power of mangudai, fast rams and full siege - all benefited from Gold Rush map as Pers is slow to centre)
Saracens vs Spans (This is normally in favour of Saracens, but on Gold Rush map, it's difficult for Saracen to rush the centre and hold it, therefore Spans has advantage or is at very least evenly balanced)
Mongols vs Huns (Mongols has advantage if survive rush - but since it wasn't random civ, he knows I am Huns and sets up accordingly - so his advantage)
OK now that explains everythingIgnore this guy. He was a voobly staff member aka +Good. One of the more toxic people in the DM Community.
I would recommend you to look for help from a psychologist. Your problem is you, not DE.Hey... you all seem to have some weird fascination with me... it's entertaining... Interesting to know that I'm called "toxic", but at least I'm remembered, it would be worse to not be remembered at all - like the person who posted that.
Yeah, because telling someone to see a therapist is basically give pseudo-therapist advice on the Internet. Or maybe your problem with my comment was the "your problem is you, not DE" part. Please don't tell me you think that's some attempt to give a therapist advice rather than a way of saying "you're biased on DE and you won't change your mind about it no matter what".
How am I psychoanalyzing you? Where did I use psychoanalysis to examine you?Yes
Yes, precisely, like he is psychoanalysing my online persona as though it as my actual real life behaviour. I think someone else might be slightly "disconnected" - excuse the pun.
Telling someone displaying toxic behavior that they should get mental health treatment is not "pseudo-therapist advices." In my experience, that is usually used by people to unfairly dismiss things they don't like to hear or don't understand rather than because it is actually true. Your example here does nothing to change that perception.
Your 1485 DM elo truly captures the imagination of what is possible at the highest level of this game, and is something we all aspire to. Despite our efforts, we're drawn to your magnetic personality and play style, it's absolutely scintillating.The fascination continues
It's very interesting that you are following my ELO so closely. I haven't looked at yours (or anyone else's) once.Your 1485 DM elo truly captures the imagination of what is possible at the highest level of this game, and is something we all aspire to. Despite our efforts, we're drawn to your magnetic personality and play style, it's absolutely scintillating.
Look... stop stalking me. I don't want to "look you up". I'm not interested in being your boyfriend.I looked because your profile is linked in this thread, it's not much work. Feel free to look me up on aoe2.net, my name is crawsack on there as well. However, I don't post on AoEZone and talk about how the competition level on DE is super low and that I'm just annihilating everyone I play.
I don't know who Clemensor is, I don't care... However, I've played AoE2:TC (RM, DM & CS) for 20+ years, so I doubt his knowledge about that is any better than mine (FAIR - new civs and techs excluded). I've historically played at 1800+ RM and 2k+ DM level and built my own strategies from scratch. Frankly, if your friend thinks huns beats saracens, he won't be a "high level" DM player for very long.Again, my annoyance with you in this thread thus far is all your comments have been very cocky, and your explanation for your losses is "civ win" for your opponent, then telling @Clemensor who's a high level DM player that he doesn't know what he's talking about compared to you which is a joke.
Humility? Like you and others here?My advice is: speak with a little more humility and gratitude. I initially hopped on this thread happy to help you and willing to share what knowledge I had. Your response was to be dismissive and complain and you've continued that, now you're playing the victim role which is nauseating.
Where did he claim that? He only disagreed with you that ValihrAnt had the better civ in each of the games.Frankly, if your friend thinks huns beats saracens, he won't be a "high level" DM player for very long.
Where can I donate to the prizepool?Where did he claim that? He only disagreed with you that ValihrAnt had the better in each of the games.
None of these matches where Huns vs Saracens btw.
Seems there's only one way to solve this: @Clemensor vs @IvIuSiC Bo4, Clemensor playing with the civs @IvIuSiC had and @IvIuSiC playing with ValihrAnts civs.
So it would be Teutons (IvIusic) vs Huns (Clemensor) on Gold Rush, Huns (IvIusic) vs Mongols (Clemensor) on Arabia, Spanish (IvIusic) vs Saracens (Clemensor) on Gold Rush and Mongols (IvIusic) vs Persians (Clemensor) on Gold Rush.