Hi guys,
This morning I decided to play some noob HD coz I had some free time, I jumped into a 4v4 arabia game, picking Vikings in the lobby like I often do.
Then some 2k Steam guy (Out2 something), argued with me like right away in the chat - like you may know most HD guys loathe Vikings - so we went on arguing, it was cordial yet intense, his arguments were:
The only useful infantry on a Team Game with trade are Eagles, Halbs, Goth infantry floods and Woads. Even if Persian infantry have the worst swords in the game, they are still more useful than Vikings just because "they have halbs and Viks don't"...
And it peaks on the time he said "Persian infantry is better than Vik infantry ". Ofc I was very shocked, and wanted him to shut him up and prove him wrong with some Vik Champs action, but unfortunately we randomed in the same team.
I wonder how you guys who are from Voobly, hence better than us, agree with these kind of statements.
This morning I decided to play some noob HD coz I had some free time, I jumped into a 4v4 arabia game, picking Vikings in the lobby like I often do.
Then some 2k Steam guy (Out2 something), argued with me like right away in the chat - like you may know most HD guys loathe Vikings - so we went on arguing, it was cordial yet intense, his arguments were:
The only useful infantry on a Team Game with trade are Eagles, Halbs, Goth infantry floods and Woads. Even if Persian infantry have the worst swords in the game, they are still more useful than Vikings just because "they have halbs and Viks don't"...
And it peaks on the time he said "Persian infantry is better than Vik infantry ". Ofc I was very shocked, and wanted him to shut him up and prove him wrong with some Vik Champs action, but unfortunately we randomed in the same team.
I wonder how you guys who are from Voobly, hence better than us, agree with these kind of statements.