Wonder dont give re because losing to him is more pathetic than no giving regg_no_re_I_go_eat?sometime u got to go eat, then u cant re :/
Wonder dont give re because losing to him is more pathetic than no giving regg_no_re_I_go_eat?sometime u got to go eat, then u cant re :/
re's are really good for the losing player. it gives them a chance to think about their mistakes and try to fix them. or if you had a good strategy it gives them a chance to try a different tactic vs it. which is really important if you cheesed them in the first place. Also if the player is competitive a loss can be demoralizing and a second chance is always nice for their ego, they either can beat you or feel like they improved against you so especially if you already have a game worth of their points I can see why people want re. iv always felt like not giving a rematch was a **** move unless the person wasn't going to play anymore at that time.
It's completely circumstantial. It's quite arrogant to expect a rematch to settle your ego for a loss, regardless of bad map, civ or whatever reason you justify to yourself. Whingers complaining about whingers says a lot about one's character on a side note.
The only area I would expect a rematch between players is when they think they're better than each other and having an ego fight. Winning one game and leaving is basically admitting you're intimidated unless you genuinely have to go, or your opponent is an asshat who is obviously not near your gaming ability without being biased.