And I still believe that!
He's a good player, but not 2k5-2k6. He has potential though, and is a nice and funny guy!
11. I loled, And you? Are you in "that" level?it's hard to explain, but i feel exactly the same about bg, he isn't in "that" level.. at least not yet!
it's hard to explain, but i feel exactly the same about bg, he isn't in "that" level.. at least not yet!
11111 Viper fail 24
winning 2 games without stone walls vs Viper, Bacg become new star in AoC. Gj! Some players also takes 1 or 2 games from Viper, but always with fuc stone walls everywhere.
it's hard to explain, but i feel exactly the same about bg, he isn't in "that" level.. at least not yet!
Just shut up and show some recpect. You always always must say something shitly under Bacg games.
You should quit AOC as promised Carlos :lol: 2k2 my assi turn on stream first thing i hear, " i think bacgio is good player, but NOT as good as his rate says"
wonder is not a man of his own words and plays a game of kings where they used to die for their promises :D
-1You have no ideia of what you are talking about.
-1
-1
He doesn't feel hurt :P
Best post of 2012.its hard to explain but atleast the reason its this, anyone Remember Riut whit crazy micro (Riut was playing all days for so much hours in that time), Viper (in new times, same thing) now bac, a good friend its playing all days too.. so this means if u have so much time for AoC u can be a good player i think that´s all ... when i watch the experts game in a long battle good micro and excelent eco its the difference..., and when i watch the ideas about Cris and Daut in all maps the improvisation its different , but hmm **** dunno can i wrote like i feel right now ... bag (my dear friend) and viper and so much active players dont have this ideas about the games they just win cause they are more fasters (and u just can be faster if play alot AoC, like in the life the practice makes the master)
Example: i can reach from 18+ to 2k if i can have the time for play that´s when i dont have so much work , then i leave from AoC two monts or more, and whit the same ideas and more slowly i down to 18+ i think this explain what i want to say...
It does!its hard to explain but atleast the reason its this, anyone Remember Riut whit crazy micro (Riut was playing all days for so much hours in that time), Viper (in new times, same thing) now bac, a good friend its playing all days too.. so this means if u have so much time for AoC u can be a good player i think that´s all ... when i watch the experts game in a long battle good micro and excelent eco its the difference..., and when i watch the ideas about Cris and Daut in all maps the improvisation its different , but hmm **** dunno can i wrote like i feel right now ... bag (my dear friend) and viper and so much active players dont have this ideas about the games they just win cause they are more fasters (and u just can be faster if play alot AoC, like in the life the practice makes the master)
Example: i can reach from 18+ to 2k if i can have the time for play that´s when i dont have so much work , then i leave from AoC two monts or more, and whit the same ideas and more slowly i down to 18+ i think this explain what i want to say...
nah,he said to me he think to day u just perform for everyone watch ur stream,not play serious so don't worry cause he know where he stand ,rating is not allAnd I still believe that!
He's a good player, but not 2k5-2k6. He has potential though, and is a nice and funny guy!
PPl are missing the concept about rating and skill, some players, by some reasons, are just overrated at some points or underrated.. Feage had a 2200 2300 rating by the time he played GML, can you watch the games and notice the difference between his game level and TIm's or Chris? no... because their skill was rly close, even with a 200-300 rating difference..
Another example is that Viper wasn't #1 rate during GML, but yet, he showed that he was 1 step forward them other players. When i said the "2k4 my ass" think to Bg, i also said that we had rly similar skills, by the time i tought smtg around 2300, but by that time, my rating was around it, and his rate was like 2500. Since them, bg is playing a lot, and improving his skills, but killing someone in 1/2/3 games, doesn't prove anything... ppl is always trying to find offenses and trash talk... but there is none, bg knows viper is stronger, he knows that their skill diffence isn't well represented by 2k6 to 2k5, rating when u surpass 2300 mark is rly unstable.. u can reach 2500 2600 by playing a lot (cause there are rly few players to play vs!)
im like 150 points overrated right now.. anyone in viper/jord level who plays vs me, will "feel" it, for the ones watching recs/streams, it's rly hard to see deeply into rating systen and say if a player can be well represented by his current rate or if he is overrated/underrated...
For Sieter and some other guys, you don't tell someone to shut unless your point is rly better, and u can prove it, this is a discussion forum, everyone has the right to give an opinion, but i'm pretty sure that in this topic fo example, viper and bg opinions are much more relevant them others I hope everyone sees what is my point about this...