The more logical assumption you should all make is that if Ive managed 1970 HD by not trading, and you all consider that delusional and bad strategy, wouldn't that lead you to believe Im extremely good?Since you only got there because you use an OP strategy nobody else uses, you have to clearly discount at least 100 elo compared to other players, right?
Nevertheless, even 2k HD is not high enough level to bring the roger federer argument or make any claim about success of a strategy at high level.
Note that I still believe we should talk math and not my skill level, but just pointing out you can't even get your logic right in that regard.