Isn't Tia Harribel a bunch of smurfs ? why should it be there??Tia_Harribel reached 2k3
Great effort!
This reminds me of the Smurfipedia I once intended to do :D
I have started adding links to know profiles of the players now.
I will not do it exactly from 1 to 117, but mostly from top to bottom.
If any player wishes to have removed a link from the list, I can remove it again.
And, for any accounts that have not been used in the last 4 years, I might not know them, even if a lot of you who have been on AoCZone etc. much longer than me know. So just from my own knowledge I will probably exclude some. But what matter the most are the accounts that have reached the highest ratings in the last 3 years and the ones that are well-known for these players.
Top 30 almost done [...]
Update:
New entries:
107. 2121 (czech) Janik
108. 2119 Leo
Other notable changes:
XiaoK (2203) reaches 2k2 (#66),
Arch_Koven is now 68. (2198) and for some weeks is just under 2k2.
Chris (2454) moves up to #7, now in front of Hera, F1Re, Edie, _DauT_ and Nicov, making him the 2nd-highest rated Canadian instead of 3rd.
Update:
New entries:
107. 2121 (czech) Janik
108. 2119 Leo
Other notable changes:
XiaoK (2203) reaches 2k2 (#66),
Arch_Koven is now 68. (2198) and for some weeks is just under 2k2.
Chris (2454) moves up to #7, now in front of Hera, F1Re, Edie, _DauT_ and Nicov, making him the 2nd-highest rated Canadian instead of 3rd.
By that you mean Chris is the current #1 rated player, beneath no one. http://www.voobly.com/ladder/view/Age-o ... ors/RM-1v1
2 still 7th in the list in the first post
No it wouldn't. There are lots of people who have briefly achieved number one so that would just make this list a huge tie and even more pointless. Besides, everyone already knows you're a master of AoC, do you really need to be higher on the list for some sort of validation?This list would make a lot more sense if was "highest rank achieved" because that is what counts.2 still 7th in the list in the first post