Anyone who thinks GR is better than Voobly (without anti-cheat, ratings, etc) is a noob or has a political agenda imo.
Oh? Your world must be very close. Maybe you should use wide screen patch?
Anyone who thinks GR is better than Voobly (without anti-cheat, ratings, etc) is a noob or has a political agenda imo.
You're one of very few people who would support that.i would support ($$$$) any client that bans smurfs, laggers, syncers, and cheaters in a proper way
How can you enjoy to play against people who are complete noobs?No rating is one of the best aspects of gr >_>
I am not 1v1 ara player. I never do the same over and over again.How can you enjoy doing the same build-ups every time, over and over again? (just giving a silly question in return )
You're one of very few people who would support that.i would support ($$$$) any client that bans smurfs, laggers, syncers, and cheaters in a proper way
Here is the alive proof, that 18++ dont have to be smart.I am not 1v1 ara player. I never do the same over and over again.How can you enjoy doing the same build-ups every time, over and over again? (just giving a silly question in return )
Smurfing doesn't "ruin" games. I think the only thing you can say against smurfing is that some high rated players use it to inflate their rate. Only a few people actually do that. Many players 16+, 17+, 18+, etc play on multiple accounts with no intent to help inflate their friends rating. And IMO "set teams" contributes just as much to this problem as "smurfing" does. Playing set teams vs random players who are weaker than you is quite lame imo.smurfing only has a chance to benefit the top players which are the tiny minority. how games do people need to ruin before they realize that?
when people are busy ruining someone else's game, they remove people from the pool of available players which makes it exponentially harder for everyone else to find matches
all it takes is 1 smurf to ruin a game for 7 players. and half of those players are definitely going to be less likely to play aoc when this keeps happening over and over again.
Do good players really care about ruining games for noobs? I doubt it. It pains me to play vs. low rated players, it's not fun for me. Low rated players also seem pretty good at kicking smurfs and questionable players from their game.lots of frustrated noobs because better players come in ruining their games
If smurfers were bored they wouldn't do it. I can assure you it's not boring.lots of bored smurfers who keep playing easy games, but don't really get the satisfaction of a good match
Many high players simply aren't very active making it hard to find games. Many others seem to only want to play with stacked teams or 1 game setting. Perhaps if they changed things up maybe they could find a game faster. They can make a smurf account to play different settings, vs stacked teams, etc and they will find some fun games. Or maybe they just want to play anonymously, without pressure, try new strats, etc. If they want to they will find a way to do it or find something else to do instead. Banning multiple accounts won't fix anything.lost of bored good players who decided not to smurf, because everyone else is smurfing and unavailable for games
There are many different ways to play AoC and lots of players are 2k on 1 game style but only 16xx on another. The lobby ratings are not very accurate and it has nothing to do with players having multiple accounts. Rather multiple accounts is a nice solution, I personally have about 5 names that I can play 1v1 for different maps.if you are playing on an account that is a different from your skill you are ruining everyone's expectation of a fair game and throw off the entire rating system. this has a ripple effect, which ends up killing the entire game. 2k players who play on 17xx names don't suddenly turn off the skill and play like 17xx....
sounds beautiful
In gr u never know what is the level of player you are up against and that itself makes voobly gaming much better.
Nah Voobly just sucks ass.