wow only 16++ reply.
chris stil N.1 he play wcg and this other top players no one play wcg.
so shut up all and keep use hack noobs to win rating only no skill.
and Ralber played in WCG i think.
Lol chris said he thinks he is #1. Come on... be serious. He is not that good...he did not invent 21 pop feudal...Daut can beat him anytime.
dude chris u r not really that good man.. besides the part that ur skill is below top 10 (or even less), some facts for you: tim got his rating by playing 1v1 like few months ago, daut plays here and there too..and you? you couldnt even get into league stage in last two bcc's man.. ur just some random 2k sorry
no achivements in tourneys in last two years and u wanna be no1? lol crazy guy
u seem to have very few brain cells.. please stop kissing his ass man and look reality, Chris wants privileges that noone else had who reached the top, why would he be granted those??? everyone played in same conditions for years. if he stays active for 1 more year he will prolly reach top if he still got the skills. if u accept what he wrote he'll get the rate he want and stop playing after 1 month and then he will be the one who is listed at the top and inactive.
I have 25 nicknames and i use them all.. I dont wanna see admins changing things of voobly cuz chris dont agree..
Hard topic.
First things first, lets not rate the cooping sad cunts (2k coop with 1500) because thats just cheating the rating system(i dont know why this is still possible wtf?). Delete those fake nicks with a 2450 rate cooping a 1500 to be able to play a 2100. Theres no ****ing way you cannot see this as cheating the rate system.
Now about chris his new rating system
Forget that proposal of just throwing away voobly rates! Theres some nicks i worked hard on so FU wannabe EGO mr number one who wants to have other peoples rate lowered just to be seen as 'the best'. There are other ways to do this instead of ****ing everyone over. I am sure 90% of people who would love to see this new rate system got stuck on some pathetic rate and play this game 20 times a week so it wont affect them anyway. They should shush and listen to my idea!
I think it would be interesting to have a separate '1v1 points gained last year rate' right next to overall TG rate (all time).
This way we can see easily who is best 1v1 instead of being best at stack teams/smart coop to gain rate and the active be the best 1v1 part (real player vs ***** 'experts'). And (myself included) everyone keeps their rate but theres just another one added alongside.
Keep in mind if someone cant play for two years, comes back and see all his ten 2k nicks screwed over just because some mr chris wanna be number one, well, that is just pathetic.
--------- in short: coop = unrated, (1v1 points gained last year) next to (overall TG+1v1 alltime rate)----------