The value of Partian Tactics is only for the unique unit. It only affects cavalry archers, which are seldom used.
Yes, but that doesn't mean that they aren't an option.
The only difference in the Korean and Indian siege are the onagers. Their scorpions, bombard cannons and rams are identical. The Korean onagers are awesome though.
You are right. I corrected it.
Indian monks are considerably better than their Korean counterparts. They don't lack any vital upgrades, while the Korean monks lack Redemption. The Indian monks are ridiculously easy to counter with other monks though, lacking Faith, Heresy and Atonement. They also have real trouble defending their Elephant Archers against enemy monks.
You are right again. But I think that adding more range to Elephants can help them to kill monks
I would argue that Korean infantry is overall better than Indian infantry. That last armor upgrade keeps infantry alive longer to get more hits in where it counts. A halberdier usually isn't going to worry about +2 attack, as you are using it to kill cavalry anyway. But +2 pierce armor really helps keep archers or skirmishers from killing it as fast. If it can get one more hit in because it survived, it will end up doing more damage than the Indian one in most cases. A similar, though lesser, analogy can be drawn about champions versus trash, buildings, or eagles.
Playing a regicide game now as the Indians, I can definitely attest that researching it is a very viable strategy in Regicide.btw I agree that sultans needs to be debugged, But even after I think that its still a viable strat
Wall of camels with EQAs covering them from behind in imp-no counter for that!And they have a great eco to make sure they reach there.I think the whole point of elephants' weaknesses is conversion but how can it be emphasized if no non ele civs can't have the extra advantage of faith and heresy because no-one will shell out such an eye-watering amount of gold if the enemy can simply stop making monks therby nullifying the techs.
I would argue that Korean infantry is overall better than Indian infantry. That last armor upgrade keeps infantry alive longer to get more hits in where it counts. A halberdier usually isn't going to worry about +2 attack, as you are using it to kill cavalry anyway. But +2 pierce armor really helps keep archers or skirmishers from killing it as fast. If it can get one more hit in because it survived, it will end up doing more damage than the Indian one in most cases. A similar, though lesser, analogy can be drawn about champions versus trash, buildings, or eagles.
You changed my mind I'm going to modify it again.
They don't, unless you play all techs, in which case the Indians are the only civilization to get imperial camels. Their camels are weaker with all techs though.I'd probably go with bombard cannons + tonnes of halberdiers against it, but it's still a nasty combination. Though unlikely to ever be seen, because no one plays all techs.Maybe give camels a bonus vs vills so they can be used for raiding also (no knights to raid) Does Indians get Heavy Scorpions? If so, I thin camels + HS can take down about anything..