If this is true,then Indians is worst civ both rush and no rush,coz they haven't provided good uu,and now imp camels 24,its only unit used with ease. It's really a shame how they haven't given anything except cheap vill
If this is true,then Indians is worst civ both rush and no rush,coz they haven't provided good uu,and now imp camels 24,its only unit used with ease. It's really a shame how they haven't given anything except cheap vill
stop crying because indians are not overpowered
Possibly the second worst post on this forum: your figures are completely wrong and you've made an assumption to everyone when clearly not everyone thinks it.imperial camel -- cost 60 food 75 gold 160 HP armour 5/7 attack 14+4=18 bonus attack +18 against cavilary
paladin ----------- cost 55 food 60 gold 160 HP armour 5/5 attack 9+4=13
camel ------------- cost 60 food 75 gold 120 HP armour 3/2 attack 5+1=6 bonus attack +10 against cavilary
knight ------------ cost 55 food 60 gold 100 HP armour 3/3 attack 10+1=11
is it fair in initial stage? or indians only supposed to defend?
Everybody agrees EA are totally useless. Only effective against weak archers. two champions can also kill one EA. Even if u make lot of EA. enemy can outnumber with any cheap units.
is it underpowered or balanced civ?
nobody is saying overpower it. Dont make it underpowered civ.
Post recs if you want to make a real example of why something is bad, just words without a real reason is not good enough.I'm not saying Indians are weak. They are quite good in boom games, most of the maps. My only point is the imperial camel upgrade which is very expensive and slow, can have its real worth only when there is an appropriate increase in its attack bonus vs cavalry. Like Halbediers get +32 attack vs cavalry while pikemen get only +22, I feel Imperial camels should get some more bonus vs cavalry than heavy camels. Fayt/ZeroEmpires can suggest this change for the next patch if u feel its appropriate.
best solution to solve that "problem": give the civ a new name