Why you take this stuff so damn serious.
Am refusing to play for 200$ is funny and seems weird, there really isn't much money in aoe involved.
All edie said is fine and not an attack it is his opinion on Heartts idea how to play this game.
You may not like edies opinion but him "digging out" this old game to show Am (or better said Heartt and Lierry) lost two big finals without winning a game is a funny thing.
Especially stefans post is pure sarcasm and comedy, it is fun to read and we should all laugh about it.
Edie knows very well that he won't change Heartts approach towards aoe, but it is totally fine if he points out inconsistencies in Heartts logic (from his pov)
The tone might not always be ideal but keep in mind he is french and not a native english speaker.
Anyway I don't want to go to deep into it, this topic was a good laugh, no need to get triggered 11
Am refusing to play for 200$ is funny and seems weird, there really isn't much money in aoe involved.
All edie said is fine and not an attack it is his opinion on Heartts idea how to play this game.
You may not like edies opinion but him "digging out" this old game to show Am (or better said Heartt and Lierry) lost two big finals without winning a game is a funny thing.
Especially stefans post is pure sarcasm and comedy, it is fun to read and we should all laugh about it.
Edie knows very well that he won't change Heartts approach towards aoe, but it is totally fine if he points out inconsistencies in Heartts logic (from his pov)
The tone might not always be ideal but keep in mind he is french and not a native english speaker.
Anyway I don't want to go to deep into it, this topic was a good laugh, no need to get triggered 11
Last edited: