Is there room in the game for future expansions? Are there particular civs you'd like to see? I've made a poll with some current notable omissions, but name your ideas in the comments!
Thule/Skraeling are Vikings, arent they?
Oh my bad than. But can we say they ever built an Empire?Thule/Skraeling are Vikings, arent they?
They were the proto-Inuit peoples of North America and the Arctic.
"Zimbabweans"
What would their UU be? Wooden stick warrior that costs 15 wood and 1 food, has 20 hp and -1/-1 armor? Does this game really need 35 more civs 90% of all players have never heard of and were totally historically irrelevant?
Aren't 31 civs enough already, do we really need more?
Aren't 31 civs enough already, do we really need more?
Isn't 3 civ enough?
Hun Mayan Aztec
Delete the rest
I vote for Habsburg Monarchy!
Belgian (no, not Franks nor Celts).
I'm fairly sure creating monks should cost stone rather than wood because we were successfully stoning them during middle ages KappaAccording to forgotten works new civs would be like:
Inuits complete tec tree, don't need to advance to next ages. UU a red skin archer with 30 pierce armor
Lithuanians infantry civ infantry line get extra 5 attack per age, creating monks cost wood.
Polish, free university upgrades, villagers work 40% faster
Swish ,every resource they gather gives them 1 extra gold, UU artillery unit that shoots 3 bullets (25 damage per shoot)
Zimbabwe, villagers get +40 HP, UU lion warriors faster than cavalry with 50 attack 25 hp cost no gold.
Well, Austrians have rich history, why not when we have Magyars and TurksI vote for Habsburg Monarchy!
Because?