T
these game have been played and it was a BO3 :lol: :lol:Just looking at this line up makes me excited(no homo). I predict a 5-3 victory for the DT
People never cease to be deliberately obtuse when it suits them.
If this was Tyrant we'd have 10 pages explaining how little effort they put in, how they haven't had any time to practice, how Viper was trolling etc.
People never cease to be deliberately obtuse when it suits them.
If this was Tyrant we'd have 10 pages explaining how little effort they put in, how they haven't had any time to practice, how Viper was trolling etc.
So you are the guy who balances everything in the obtuse side but for SY?, the second match was a good match btw.
Glad to hear they didn't take it seriously. I thought their double flank-pocket laming on me and riut min 1 and their full teamwall by min 9 was just a trolling tactic!
Of course it is a small showmatch with hardly any prestige, but this is how dream matches are in general. All the prestige etc. lies in the main tournament. The highest level of gameplay is expected to be shown in the finals.Independent of that, I feel like a BO3 isn't fully using the potential of the Dream team match. I mean this match is between the best team of the tournament and the team with the players that the community thinks has best chances of beating them. So it allows the assumption it might show the highest level of gameplay.
A BO3 wastes that opportunity and degrades it so a small showmatch at the end with not a lot of prestiege on the line. Maybe change that and there won't be worries of teams not taking it seriously
Why is it even something to mention when all your arguments can just as easily be used for the dream team? The 4 players had 0 practice all together and there is no reason to believe their interest in winning the show match was any higher than that of SY. It was probably even lower.People never cease to be deliberately obtuse when it suits them.
If this was Tyrant we'd have 10 pages explaining how little effort they put in, how they haven't had any time to practice, how Viper was trolling etc.
So you are the guy who balances everything in the obtuse side but for SY?, the second match was a good match btw.
Nope, that was just an aside. Didn't expect you to catch on to that, though.
My point about them not taking seriously was about the lack of practice building up to the games (which pig confirmed). Same thing happened in the two NC tournaments. Obviously once the game has started they're trying to win, but I've got the sense for a while now that their interest in the DT match is fleeting at best.
Idk how you can compare SY and Tyrant...
SY, are training 24/7, playing as a team and as individuals, so when they lost against DT, it was just briliant play by DT
Tyrant practise so little after being the best for many years, so when they lose it is beacuse they have not practised, if they would practise the, could beat SY, but it cant be said otherwise
I think people should base the skill level more on outcomes of tournaments and how often they wins, and Not base on how good of an excuse maker you are. Making excuses usually makes people actually look worse.