Why is this:
3. Mongols (13) (4-5)
4. Aztecs (8) (3-3)
?
Win + loss is less than the total for these civs.
Why is this:
3. Mongols (13) (4-5)
4. Aztecs (8) (3-3)
?
Win + loss is less than the total for these civs.
the answer: CA costs 60 gold in general now and huns get just a 10% cost bonus in castle age for them, that means: the +15% fire rate bonus is nearly as strong as huns bonus, and we could say hun's ca = mongol's ca (in castle age)
Why is this:
3. Mongols (13) (4-5)
4. Aztecs (8) (3-3)
?
Win + loss is less than the total for these civs.
the answer: CA costs 60 gold in general now and huns get just a 10% cost bonus in castle age for them, that means: the +15% fire rate bonus is nearly as strong as huns bonus, and we could say hun's ca = mongol's ca (in castle age)
wut?
the question is why wins+los is less than the total games played with this civs.
your answer doesnt make any sense to that 11, but carlos answered anyway :D