11. Go back to original topic post, and i didnot say "fully-boomed" mayan or celt. I understand the ambiguity of the question and that this is hard to test but maybe without vague rules like 34 min no attack maybe someone can test vs me.
I'm not john, and not responsible for any "rule" he or lug made in their test.
If you think more about this 34 min imp rule it will allow celt to fight fully popped vs a mayan which isnt going to happen in real games. So I'm not "changing" any rules. And btw, john's boom sucked and he didnt get upgrades early at all, 0 attack ups for eew and plums not even FU'ed while lug has like 3 units FU- EWR, HS and SR. Sorry i dont think anything is proved in a test where an equal number of mayan units without even being FU lost vs a FU celt army.
And if you read back this thread the only reason why this thread became 20 + pages is just because of ARES interpreting my remark in a way i didnot mean. And not really because of startegy. If he made his first post regarding my "arrogant" remark that some people here dont realise that plums really pwn woads, ok its understandable. BUT even after i told him what i meant when i make such a post he decided to continue with his personal vendetta. This made this discussion go for 12 more pages when it should have stopped at something like page 10 or so.
I'm not john, and not responsible for any "rule" he or lug made in their test.
I didnt say or pretend im confident in knowledge about the game, i said about what i think on mayan vs celt. I seen many situations(not talking about expert games now) celts struggling to counter mayans in real games in imp even after the situation seemed equal or worse for mayan.if you are that confident in your knowledge of the game, why are you asking so many questions in the first place?
If you think more about this 34 min imp rule it will allow celt to fight fully popped vs a mayan which isnt going to happen in real games. So I'm not "changing" any rules. And btw, john's boom sucked and he didnt get upgrades early at all, 0 attack ups for eew and plums not even FU'ed while lug has like 3 units FU- EWR, HS and SR. Sorry i dont think anything is proved in a test where an equal number of mayan units without even being FU lost vs a FU celt army.
And if you read back this thread the only reason why this thread became 20 + pages is just because of ARES interpreting my remark in a way i didnot mean. And not really because of startegy. If he made his first post regarding my "arrogant" remark that some people here dont realise that plums really pwn woads, ok its understandable. BUT even after i told him what i meant when i make such a post he decided to continue with his personal vendetta. This made this discussion go for 12 more pages when it should have stopped at something like page 10 or so.