I dont know what settings you are talking about ?!
At arena map last 3 match up which I can recall I played brit vs byza I won 3:0.
3 different players one had about +100 higher rating then me.
Usual ratio my winning/lose is 1:1.
By statistic for me at arena are brit much better then byza.
PS: About Elit Cata, I am a little bit sceptic because resarche of this bastard taking years..
Ecats have trample damage, 150HP and speed.
Elbows have a mere 40HP, die like flies next to Ecats and a slow rof.
So a pure ecat flood will not be stopped unless you got your Elbows under 5 castles or so.
You also need a meatshield for Elbows -champs or something.
..but Brits still lose. Imo they don't really stand a chance, unless your opposition is as capable...
Only problem is mapcontrol. If you are 1v1 byz should be attacking three sides constantly with rams and cheap trash towers etc. Cata's suck ass vs brit who is already massed and knows how to micro archer halb onager army. Theres no such thing as cataphract rush, it takes ages.
I agree w/ archers/onagers, but halbs don't last vs ecats and don't have the anti-cav bonus either.
Wouldn't it be better to use lightcav or rams?
If the game lasts and the map allows, massing ecats is not that improbable. And civs w/o good archers+heavy scorps are usually doomed.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.