My posts were based on the following, which have now confused me:
So are you taking assumptions or not? I agree that thought has limits.
What I have tried to do is present a truth in logic - which can be built without 0 assumptions.
No what i mean is I can build one without assumptions, but you have already assumed that one cant be built.
I am saying that you HAVE to take an assumption.
So are you taking assumptions or not? I agree that thought has limits.