Idk why now huns have no stonewall and expensive CAs... imo now is really a weaker civ. All the civs have CA with 65 gold and most of them have too +4+6 armor, while huns only +3 +4. It looks that they forgot to remove paladins too, and then we have a very weak civ. Whats the point to ruin a civ like that?
Completely disagree with you guys. Huns are still a top (if not the top) 1v1 civ. Huns feudal age is basically not affected (no stone walls doesn't make them a **** civ magically) and their CA are now more balanced, yet still awesome. To say that they are ruined and are a weak civ is laughable. Frankly, it's embarrassing to read comments like that.
Problem is that, in castle age raping huns eco will be less problematic, cuz paliside just die in 2 - 3 sec. But huns never was leading in eco after castle age and now cant have cheap ca. so whats the idea of removing stone walls?