First, think you must develop some skill on 2/3 common strats like monk rush, UU rush and know how to boom properly from 3 TC's or 4 TC's (wW_hereIam teached me how to play that way).
Now, answer the following: you normally play random or mirror civ? If you play random, some match ups could appear like monk rush civ "a" vs boom civ "b" and you can practice how to defend/attack from monk rush. Is this one of your favorite strats? Or you prefer to just collect relics and go for a FI?
Depending on your favorite strat, you can download dozens of recs from player "x", "y", because some are more suitable for that specific strat. Example: xTeRRoRx prefer to monk rush or FI/Treb and Wakko plays in a more conservative way, with more pop feudal-castle and with better economy.
Hudge disapointement what i have read in this topic, seems only true players know who is best arena player:
the real legend of arina: #Tom_Yum aka Tom_Push Tom_Monk Tom_Smush aka ":D noob".
Miguel showed to be the Master of Arena he won everyone, someone two times, and there were good arena players like Nicov, Fedex, Monoz, Edie, Lojza, St4rk, Terror, Fayt, a japanese guy who was in final 11... so i think as long as he got the title if someone wanna say whos better need to beat him xD
In master of arena, i just havent the level yet to win, was my first real 1v1 tournament, got over nervous (didn't take medical :D ) player like miguel, fedex and somes other was better than me, in many things, I havent experience with economy.
I believe since it I improved, for sure... But doesnt make me "best" at arena.
It's only because I am the only one that play it 1v1 so often so you guys see always my rec here or in stream, compared to others, so I had opportunity to play and take game from all best players without exeption, and since moarena, i havent lose a single arena game in all tournament i have played, but doesnt make me best at it.
Also im a rusher, all others arena player are more boomer than rusher, so that why i think i can beat somes people that other arena strong player cant cant beat, but beside this they can win me and i can lose to less skilled, as often 2ks whereas them never lost to less player skilled than I do sometimes.
But somes players in shape, like Savas for example, are so strong.... So complet in arena, in economy as in rush, in non eco as in eco, in micro as in macro! Who is for me, the best in arena, in his period, he was definitly the best, and bring arena in a very high level.
Somes players, like wakko, with best creativity...
Fedex/Miguel, are imo both same level, really strong too.....
All theses player have better economy/macro than me in arena(maybe not that much now, but still overrall they all have better economy gestion/imp), wich is very important, one thing i am good at, is trick thing, strategies etc, but sometimes it can fail. That why in somes mirrorciv, like viking, brit etc, they are better than me, without doubt for me because economy most important, but in civ pick civ, like meso civ, i feel i am better because strat seems most important. believe i really have to keep improving on my economy/imp game to be what i want to be.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.