Poll question is for Random LM, 1vs1 or small TG(same team skill).
Not about Huns, Brits etc., who have obvious advantages, but all other random civs.
Which of the 2 strats would you most likely prefer?
May seem like a dumb question :?: , but do tell:
Why don't people prefer massed archers, and rather prefer FC massing CA?
-archers can start massing from feudal.
-archers cost less
-the upgrades/ranges built are the same.
-U can pressure with archers earlier on in the game.
-They defeat same units as CA
-By the time u start massing CA u already have a formidable force of archers putting pressure on opponent.
Only ''+'' I find in CAs is speed.
...gotta be missing somethin' :lol:
Not about Huns, Brits etc., who have obvious advantages, but all other random civs.
Which of the 2 strats would you most likely prefer?
May seem like a dumb question :?: , but do tell:
Why don't people prefer massed archers, and rather prefer FC massing CA?
-archers can start massing from feudal.
-archers cost less
-the upgrades/ranges built are the same.
-U can pressure with archers earlier on in the game.
-They defeat same units as CA
-By the time u start massing CA u already have a formidable force of archers putting pressure on opponent.
Only ''+'' I find in CAs is speed.
...gotta be missing somethin' :lol: