I've been playing a lot of Land Nomad lately and one thing I've noticed is that archer rush is so uncomon. Except for Huns calvary archer or Plumed Archer, no other civi would execute a rush with archer units. First: it takes time until Crossbowman are massed. If not massed, Knights will rape them. Second: it needs resourcers to make them effective and that's delay your Imp time. Third: They're "easy" to be countered. One Mangonel shot and your rush is failed. Fourth and probably the most important: they are slow.
I see that archer rush is unefficient in Land Nomad as they have to walk a lot until reach enemy base and when you finally reach there, you still have to face Knights and/or Mangonel. What a waste doing archer rush, that's why only calvary rush and Plumed Archers are the only ones who are really worth to try, they are fast. They can run around map, explore, take sheeps and still cause some disturb to your oponents. Conquistadors are also good, and doesn't even require upgrades. Always make Conquistadors in Land Nomad.
Share your thoughts about archer rush (Crossbowman) in Land Nomad, is it worth?
I see that archer rush is unefficient in Land Nomad as they have to walk a lot until reach enemy base and when you finally reach there, you still have to face Knights and/or Mangonel. What a waste doing archer rush, that's why only calvary rush and Plumed Archers are the only ones who are really worth to try, they are fast. They can run around map, explore, take sheeps and still cause some disturb to your oponents. Conquistadors are also good, and doesn't even require upgrades. Always make Conquistadors in Land Nomad.
Share your thoughts about archer rush (Crossbowman) in Land Nomad, is it worth?