kkab u kno i love u but i think there is a bias when u talk about chris...11
i am totally agree. :$11
i will be shhhhhhhhhh.
kkab u kno i love u but i think there is a bias when u talk about chris...11
Kkab nobody disagrees about their talent but in terms of AoC they were nothing out the ordinary.
my opinion is different. most strategies came from them.
Kkab nobody disagrees about their talent but in terms of AoC they were nothing out the ordinary.
my opinion is different. most strategies came from them.
If you can name atleast 2-3 strategies, i'll rest my case. And by strategy, I am talking classic = "The word classic means something that is a perfect example of a particular style, something of lasting worth or with a timeless quality". A good example is drush provided by The Sheriff - patened by Iffaca and perfected by Daut.
Feudal | Castle | Imperial | |
---|---|---|---|
kkab | 00:09:51 | 00:18:38 | - |
daut | 00:12:59 | 00:17:55 | - |
kkab |
daut |
Time |
2. 5 rax, 5archery, 5stable made by grunt.
he used to beat koven on kr ms 2v2 tourney. and grunt used in semi-final.
2. 5 rax, 5archery, 5stable made by grunt.
he used to beat koven on kr ms 2v2 tourney. and grunt used in semi-final.
Why 5 of each one? If I see a player doing that on a game, I wouldn't think "oh, he is doing the 5-5-5 strategy", I would think he did it becouse he can, becouse their resources allowed him to build it.
Grunt has a timing to make 5-5-5? Why was it good? On what situation you should go 5-5-5?
I love theorycrafting.
This is information I wanted to know and your English is perfectly fine Kkab. The transport arch + galley was being used by Halen during WCL and it was very nice to see. The word I was looking for is timeless. Strategies that can be applied at any era/time and still work effectively. Your post is very informative and gives all players the correct history of AOE/K/C thanks for sharing.
+1always love to read kkab's post
Kkab, what about IORI? you never speak about him...
And Ding and Bling? I think that they were great!
Time to honour one of the greats of AoC.
Kaiser_Wilhelm would win 8-9 out of 10 games vs any European but Arch_Koven_ but was even better than him. That's how a legend is created.
I met yanzi in a aoc msn group on 2010 ,we all talk together and he say he trained ding so hard(played 100 match) before he leave aoc(around 2006). Also we played some games, just fc tg with my other friend with yanzi. He is really a powerful player, he didn't touch aoc for 4 year but he played very great in those games. After that we haven't keep any contact and he start to play sc2 with his old aoc friends. I think those should be his last aoc games.Kkab, what about IORI? you never speak about him...
And Ding and Bling? I think that they were great!
.............................
do u want to kill me?
i need explain "icbk, hanyu first. and all china clan too if tell about iori, also his best partner bt4
chinese likes rush from aok.
it need explain about jordan(not tyrant, iamjordan who was 2nd winner of wcgc), kendx, kmkm, aluba and so on.
i need tell about yanzi too if explain about ding.
it would be really long story and my english is gg for it.
i don't know about bling well.
i just remember "cry as audi" when i think about bling. :$.
but we can't forget "l_clan_geek" before explain about bling.
You're being biased. DevilZ_High was european if i remember correctly.Time to honour one of the greats of AoC.
Kaiser_Wilhelm would win 8-9 out of 10 games vs any European but Arch_Koven_ but was even better than him. That's how a legend is created.
Because at his best, he completely dominated the game.Agree with Funito. Koven has made no contribution towards AOC. Though he was a great player, I don't see how he was any different from someone who invested a lot of time into this game and played it really well.
That's quite subjective. Gutter rat had arguably one of the biggest contribution to the game (flush) and the vast mayority of people don't even know who he was.I've yet to see any strategy Koven invented and in order to be a Legend in my book, you need to be more then just a great player, you need to change the game itself.
He never won the WCG and lost the final of Clash of Titans (biggest online tournament at the time). He did win Albaret cup. Still, again, he was widely acknowledged as the best.He was just an assassin during tournaments with proper training. He may have been a great copy-cat but Viper is the real deal.
He was 4thin 2001's WCG. How on earth is that not being top?chris wasn't top 2000, 2001, 2002.
Kkab, what about IORI? you never speak about him...
And Ding and Bling? I think that they were great!
.............................
do u want to kill me?
i need explain "icbk, hanyu first. and all china clan too if tell about iori, also his best partner bt4
chinese likes rush from aok.
it need explain about jordan(not tyrant, iamjordan who was 2nd winner of wcgc), kendx, kmkm, aluba and so on.
i need tell about yanzi too if explain about ding.
it would be really long story and my english is gg for it.
i don't know about bling well.
i just remember "cry as audi" when i think about bling. :$.
but we can't forget "l_clan_geek" before explain about bling.
I guess we'll have to disagree. Besides from High and Elfanor, i don't think he'd be able to take 9 out of 10 games from Loko, Slugur nor Northwarrior. This is again, speculation, both from your side and mine.DevilZ_High and Elfanor were the other two dominating European players after Kaiser_Wilhelm pre 1.0c. patch. Remember the MFO tournament in which High beat Koven. In this time period Kaiser was a far more capable player though. Pre 1.0c it's Kaiser, High, Elfanor. Elfanor would move on to become #1 in Empire Earth and Kaiser dominated in Empire Earth as well as Age of Mythology. Don't know what happened to High.