~shakes head in disbelief~
~looks for the like button~
~shakes head in disbelief~
I was answering 8th wonder's remark that i got lucky every time i killed 1850 players in 1v1 arab.BuzZ_Quiller said:John_Mendl said:OK so i got lucky EVERY SINGLE TIME i killed 1850+ players. And u dint get lucky EVEN ONCE when u killed those players whom u mentioned. And u sure beaten them 50% times.
@Pluto: Most of them were more than a year ago. One of those u can find by searching topics created by me. I may have others in my PC but im away from home now.
I hardly ever see you playing TG, so how many times exactly did you kill 185+ huns pocket with conqs?
Yeah just to give some random noob opinion who generally never plays Arabia or TG, I would like to have some records (or facts). You guys are just saying Conquis are good no they are not over and over again.
Yeah just to give some random noob opinion who generally never plays Arabia or TG, I would like to have some records (or facts). You guys are just saying Conquis are good no they are not over and over again.
that is easy go to wcl 7 recs and look for 3v3 or 4v4 arabia with spain as a civ. if you find that it's already a victory
Yeah just to give some random noob opinion who generally never plays Arabia or TG, I would like to have some records (or facts). You guys are just saying Conquis are good no they are not over and over again.
that is easy go to wcl 7 recs and look for 3v3 or 4v4 arabia with spain as a civ. if you find that it's already a victory
Well true, but you will find more games with China instead of Mayans, too. That doesn't mean that Huns+Mongol+China is better.
that is easy go to wcl 7 recs and look for 3v3 or 4v4 arabia with spain as a civ. if you find that it's already a victory
Well true, but you will find more games with China instead of Mayans, too. That doesn't mean that Huns+Mongol+China is better.
No, thats why not ALL the teams go hun + mong + china. Some prefer china over maya, in none of the games does someone pick spa over any of those civs tho.
ive seen few 1800+ tgs were people used conqs pocket and won vs knights pocket. I will find some of those when im back home.Amsterdam said:rofl @ the guy saying conqs as pocket is better than knights
you watch a lot of expert records for sure, or do you think if it were better they would not do this?
since when 1800+ is expert?ive seen few 1800+ tgs were people used conqs pocket and won vs knights pocket. I will find some of those when im back home.Amsterdam said:rofl @ the guy saying conqs as pocket is better than knights
you watch a lot of expert records for sure, or do you think if it were better they would not do this?
chris obvoisly was wrongI remeber 1 game where L clan frodo was span pocket and Chris flank /(goth) and frodo asked chris if he could do conqs, but Chris insisted on him going knights