So you want to educate the rest of us on your preference (without legal grounding,) that streamers don't sponsor poker?
I'm not sure why you are apparently taking such personal interest in this - maybe because you are a streamer yourself.
It is just a discussion. Maybe it can give me or others a different perspective, maybe it can change minds, maybe it can't. Maybe it can make the streamer think about his behavior - or not.
It doesn't aim to achieve anything more than that, and in this it has succeeded - or so I think at least. That's all an internet discussion can do, really. Viper for example made a thoughtful post on the issue and he didn't appear to take personal offense. That was also not the intention, regardless of your personal take on my wording. See again:
Again, not sure what your problem is.
That's all nice and well that Viper bothered to respond -- but it should be highlighted he was under no obligation to do so, least of all considering he hasn't done anything wrong.
By the way.
Interesting to see here that people can't distinguish between law and moral. As if lawful behaviour would be automatically moral and non-lawful behaviour automatically immoral.
Even then, when the law is just the business rules of a company.
Very low understanding of morality that is.
It is substituting the question of "is it right to do it?" with the question of "did someone allow me to do it?" which is just terrible.